{ "_meta": { "title": "专题原始记录与不确定纪年索引", "format": "cozlab-atlas/1", "note": "材料与限制，不代表确年事件或精确古址。", "updated": "2026-10-26" }, "attestations": [ { "id": "bx-a-8f2ab0b6bc87", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E01", "reason": "A只对应唐时文本表述，不为晋事或现代地理定位背书。", "record": { "id": "BX-E01", "source_id": "BX-S01", "locator": "河内县·太行径条", "quote": "連山中斷曰陘。", "plain": "连绵山地中断之处称作陉。", "claim": "题引可以直接采用此句并署李吉甫元和志；此句在“述征记曰”之前。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "唐代地理定义", "limits": "A只对应唐时文本表述，不为晋事或现代地理定位背书。", "adoption": "web_draft", "use": "opening_anchor", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-863b9e405d10", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E06", "reason": "与元和志互为不同传文片段；不能凭两段直接复原整篇。", "record": { "id": "BX-E06", "source_id": "BX-S04", "locator": "卷五十三·陉", "quote": "《述征記》曰：燕趙間，凡厥山路，名之曰陘，井陘在常山。", "plain": "述征记说，燕赵之间的山路称作陉，井陉位于常山。", "claim": "御览保存另一则释陉佚文，不是八陉完整名单。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "宋类书保存旧文", "limits": "与元和志互为不同传文片段；不能凭两段直接复原整篇。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-277910cf752e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E07", "reason": "具体原文与注释边界待版影复核；此判断基于唐代行政称谓的层次。", "record": { "id": "BX-E07", "source_id": "BX-S01", "locator": "八陉列名", "quote": "第一曰軹關陘，今屬河南府濟源縣，在縣理西十一里；", "plain": "第一是轵关陉，编书时属河南府济源县，在县治西十一里。", "claim": "今属河南府济源县属于后代解释层，不能作为晋代行政称谓。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "唐代转引及注释", "limits": "具体原文与注释边界待版影复核；此判断基于唐代行政称谓的层次。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-3f759e08d08d", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E08", "reason": "中山历史范围非一今县，缺卷页细部定位不补坐标。", "record": { "id": "BX-E08", "source_id": "BX-S01", "locator": "八陉列名后段", "quote": "第七蒲陰陘，此三陘在中山；第八軍都陘，在幽州。", "plain": "第七是蒲阴陉，这三陉在中山；第八是军都陉，在幽州。", "claim": "列名仅给蒲阴与中山的区域关系，没有紫荆关等同句。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "唐代保存的列名", "limits": "中山历史范围非一今县，缺卷页细部定位不补坐标。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-63e03fef58de", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E17", "reason": "与元和志“西十一里”记述有差别；无须先视为同一点或等长距离。", "record": { "id": "BX-E17", "source_id": "BX-S07", "locator": "济源县·轵关", "quote": "在縣西北十五里。關當軹道之險，因曰軹關。", "plain": "位于县治西北十五里，关口据轵道险处，因而名轵关。", "claim": "轵关为轵道上的控扼点。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "清初地理记述", "limits": "与元和志“西十一里”记述有差别；无须先视为同一点或等长距离。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-6f43e1f3e2be", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E19", "reason": "只能支撑历史节点相对关系，不给出现今道路精确轨迹。", "record": { "id": "BX-E19", "source_id": "BX-S08", "locator": "泽州晋城县", "quote": "天井故關，一名太行關，在縣南四十五里太行山上。", "plain": "天井旧关又名太行关，在当时晋城县南四十五里的太行山上。", "claim": "太行陉研究可结合山南河内与山北天井关的文献节点。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "唐时所记关名与位置", "limits": "只能支撑历史节点相对关系，不给出现今道路精确轨迹。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-c4235bc9c2cf", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E20", "reason": "不能独自确定孟门、白鹿山、现存七十二拐的全部同一关系。", "record": { "id": "BX-E20", "source_id": "BX-S07", "locator": "辉县·太行山", "quote": "縣西五十里，連懷慶府界。有白陘，太行第三陘也。", "plain": "太行山在辉县西五十里，连接怀庆府界，其间有白陉，是第三陉。", "claim": "白陉位于辉县西、连接怀庆方向的山地范围。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "清初所记历史地理", "limits": "不能独自确定孟门、白鹿山、现存七十二拐的全部同一关系。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-2c17c5875345", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E21", "reason": "政府当时核定行为可作当代文献，历史遗存断代仍按今人识定C；不据此否认更早道路，也不反推石阶春秋建成。", "record": { "id": "BX-E21", "source_id": "BX-S27", "locator": "附件古遗址第18项", "quote": "白陉古道　明至清　晋城市陵川县马圪当乡横水村至双底村", "plain": "名录将白陉古道列为明至清时期遗存，地点为陵川县马圪当乡横水村至双底村。", "claim": "现存遗存图应按本名录的地点与时代标注。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2021年登记的遗存年代判断", "limits": "政府当时核定行为可作当代文献，历史遗存断代仍按今人识定C；不据此否认更早道路，也不反推石阶春秋建成。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-4b86d1aa45f2", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E22", "reason": "不由水源这一点就确定全部西行线位。", "record": { "id": "BX-E22", "source_id": "BX-S08", "locator": "磁州滏阳县·鼓山", "quote": "鼓山，一名滏山，在縣西北四十五里。滏水出焉。", "plain": "鼓山又名滏山，在当时滏阳县西北四十五里，滏水发源于此。", "claim": "滏口的河山背景可由唐代地理记载定位研究。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "唐时地理记载", "limits": "不由水源这一点就确定全部西行线位。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-b02e7c8eae39", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E23", "reason": "不能由“第四”推出一条固定跨山通道。", "record": { "id": "BX-E23", "source_id": "BX-S08", "locator": "同条", "quote": "八陘第四曰滏口陘，山嶺高深，實為險厄。", "plain": "八陉中的第四是滏口陉，山岭高深，确是险要之地。", "claim": "滏口列第四有直接文本。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "唐人沿用旧说", "limits": "不能由“第四”推出一条固定跨山通道。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-b2718b7fe14e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E24", "reason": "古县治与今土门具体对应须核地望，不以文字直接发高精坐标。", "record": { "id": "BX-E24", "source_id": "BX-S09", "locator": "获鹿县·井陉口", "quote": "井陘口，今名土門口，縣西南十里。即太行八陘之第五陘也，", "plain": "井陉口，编书时称土门口，在获鹿县西南十里，是八陉中的第五陉。", "claim": "第五陉先以土门口为文本锚点，区别山西侧诸关。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "唐时名称和相对位置", "limits": "古县治与今土门具体对应须核地望，不以文字直接发高精坐标。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-d154705ed1be", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E25", "reason": "与今固关、娘子关的对应仍为独立C层比定问题。", "record": { "id": "BX-E25", "source_id": "BX-S10", "locator": "广阳县·诸故关", "quote": "盤石故關，在縣東北七十里。葦澤故關，在縣東北八十里。", "plain": "盘石旧关在当时县治东北七十里，苇泽旧关在东北八十里。", "claim": "同一过山区域有多个关口，不能只用一座娘子关代表井陉所有时代。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "唐代地理记述", "limits": "与今固关、娘子关的对应仍为独立C层比定问题。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-a0efe21d1539", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E26", "reason": "飞狐县在唐是今涞源方向，并非把今日蔚县县城直接当唐县治；细部仍需比定。", "record": { "id": "BX-E26", "source_id": "BX-S11", "locator": "飞狐县·飞狐道", "quote": "飛狐道，自縣北入媯州懷戎縣界，即古飛狐口也。", "plain": "飞狐道从当时飞狐县向北进入妫州怀戎县境，书中称这就是古飞狐口。", "claim": "飞狐的北出关系有唐地理文本依据。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "唐时道路关系；“即古”追溯部分B", "limits": "飞狐县在唐是今涞源方向，并非把今日蔚县县城直接当唐县治；细部仍需比定。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-dfec531c7dc5", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E27", "reason": "“水斛”原字保留；具体设备结构和遗址位置未核，不白描机械构造，也不将原料画成飞狐全道运输。", "record": { "id": "BX-E27", "source_id": "BX-S11", "locator": "飞狐县·三河冶", "quote": "去飛狐錢坊二十五里，兩處同用拒馬河水，以水斛銷銅，", "plain": "距飞狐钱坊二十五里，两处都使用拒马河水；原文另说“以水斛销铜”，这个词的字形、词义和设备构造待核。", "claim": "可讲飞狐地域冶铜、钱坊与拒马河水的空间关系。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "元和七年记事及所附奏文", "limits": "“水斛”原字保留；具体设备结构和遗址位置未核，不白描机械构造，也不将原料画成飞狐全道运输。", "adoption": "web_draft", "year": { "text": "元和七年", "value": 812, "precision": "year", "conversion": "唐宪宗元和元年806，七年=812；作为文献所记项目时间" }, "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-a408c2892bec", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E28", "reason": "不能把陉口、关城和今关楼建筑一律合并。", "record": { "id": "BX-E28", "source_id": "BX-S13", "locator": "幽州昌平县", "quote": "北十五里有軍都陘。西北三十五里有納款關，即居庸故關，亦謂之軍都關。", "plain": "当时县治北十五里有军都陉，西北三十五里有纳款关，即居庸旧关，也称军都关。", "claim": "军都陉与关名在同一县条中分列，分清其空间对象。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "宋人对唐代地理追述", "limits": "不能把陉口、关城和今关楼建筑一律合并。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-05fa05ecc2b3", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E29", "reason": "定量剖面仍缺测绘和可用高程数据；不按形容词生成海拔。", "record": { "id": "BX-E29", "source_id": "BX-S06", "locator": "卷十·居庸", "quote": "兩山夾峙，下有巨澗，懸崖峭壁，稱爲絕險。", "plain": "两山对峙，下面有大溪涧，崖壁险峻。", "claim": "军都局部图可以关沟地形为叙事轴。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "清初地理记述", "limits": "定量剖面仍缺测绘和可用高程数据；不按形容词生成海拔。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-fae6b9947222", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E42", "reason": "关系图不是汉唐道路实测线，图上长城墙体不能当古道。原图授权未定。", "record": { "id": "BX-E42", "source_id": "BX-S33", "locator": "图06／PDF第54页，正文印页5／PDF第11页", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "明代关沟防御以岔道、八达岭、上关、居庸关、南口构成层次，图06有地势与历史防线图，可支持分期节点关系研究。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2022规划对明代防御的研究表达", "limits": "关系图不是汉唐道路实测线，图上长城墙体不能当古道。原图授权未定。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-00a9bc2c5fac", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E44", "reason": "不将公示稿当最终批准边界，不因并列名称认定同段或异段，需登记表。", "record": { "id": "BX-E44", "source_id": "BX-S34", "locator": "第15、66条，PDF第11、33页", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "公示稿分别列古羊肠坂道与太行陉窑头段为保护对象，可据此追索各自的登记表。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2025年公示稿列名", "limits": "不将公示稿当最终批准边界，不因并列名称认定同段或异段，需登记表。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ca0c4e7147ea", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E52", "reason": "未获原书，不扩写其完整替代路线；与五回岭一说的具体分歧仍待核。", "record": { "id": "BX-E52", "source_id": "BX-S21", "locator": "书评行123，本轮复读", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "书评所转述的崔玉谦论点同时限定古蒲阴与易县域的关系，说明反对紫荆关不能自动解释成支持五回岭全线。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2024书评对原书的转述", "limits": "未获原书，不扩写其完整替代路线；与五回岭一说的具体分歧仍待核。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-bcb5414c84a9", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E56", "reason": "有图不等于逐段古道本体核定；读取记录见map-observations.json。", "record": { "id": "BX-E56", "source_id": "BX-S46", "locator": "p29图2／3", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "图2覆盖八条陉道并有具名节点，图3可核其水系关系，八幅路线图已实际目视。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2024作者综合复原", "limits": "有图不等于逐段古道本体核定；读取记录见map-observations.json。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-0ebc7b9f9b8f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E57", "reason": "与S21所转述崔书范围存在冲突，只作有署名方案，不据此唯一比定。", "record": { "id": "BX-E57", "source_id": "BX-S46", "locator": "p29图2蒲阴分图", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "作者将蒲阴复原为涞源—浮图峪—塔崖驿—紫荆关—易县。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "作者复原方案，未逐段分期", "limits": "与S21所转述崔书范围存在冲突，只作有署名方案，不据此唯一比定。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f30e7700870f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E58", "reason": "不同论文线路条数有研究范围／分类差异，不据一图压成跨时代单线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E58", "source_id": "BX-S46", "locator": "p30首段", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "正文承认白陉主支路、滏口井店—徘徊南北两路、井陉多线。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "综合历时路网", "limits": "不同论文线路条数有研究范围／分类差异，不据一图压成跨时代单线。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ab1065f742d4", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E60", "reason": "采用作者辨析的范围，非已实测全线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E60", "source_id": "BX-S47", "locator": "pp39—40李贤注文与建武修路段", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "作者区分唐注北通怀戎与东汉代至平城修路；不能拼成同一条汉代全程。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "汉代事件／唐代注释", "limits": "采用作者辨析的范围，非已实测全线。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-3bf945a4049d", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E61", "reason": "不把今高速视为古路；五阮、紫荆等不无条件合一。", "record": { "id": "BX-E61", "source_id": "BX-S47", "locator": "pp37—38主谷与五关段", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "作者讨论黑石岭北谷地、北口与壶流河关系，并转述严耕望将涞源视为五出交通枢纽；五阮关在五回岭仍属研究比定。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "古代通道的现代考证", "limits": "不把今高速视为古路；五阮、紫荆等不无条件合一。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-3c72d409449b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E62", "reason": "五干道与另一文四线不因计数不同即可判谁错；图1据90米DEM非RTK路面图。", "record": { "id": "BX-E62", "source_id": "BX-S48", "locator": "第一节与图1", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "作者将明清井陉划分东部两条、西部三条干道，并列支路。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "明清研究范围", "limits": "五干道与另一文四线不因计数不同即可判谁错；图1据90米DEM非RTK路面图。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-5eb48cb2d503", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E63", "reason": "未读原刊全部注释；不是道路首次开辟年，也不说明所有路段同时改线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E63", "source_id": "BX-S48", "locator": "东路北段、西路北段", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "作者分别把1618官道改北而南、1542娘子关设防后的温河岸侧调整纳入线路变化解释。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "明代不同时点", "limits": "未读原刊全部注释；不是道路首次开辟年，也不说明所有路段同时改线。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-a6601400bc1b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E64", "reason": "同一书不同转述不作独立史证；原书正文未获。", "record": { "id": "BX-E64", "source_id": "BX-S49", "locator": "内容简介、第三四章目录", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "商品简介称易县，书评S21转述却排除易县；目录提示须读北平、阳安关、五回与徐河北限。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "书目／书评冲突", "limits": "同一书不同转述不作独立史证；原书正文未获。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-64d0d4583321", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E65", "reason": "仅排除该车行矿路替代古道，不否定五回方向全部可能。", "record": { "id": "BX-E65", "source_id": "BX-S50", "locator": "第二节网页308行", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "考察者自述翻的是于成岭，距五回岭主峰约二三公里，并非古五回道至少非主道。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "现代考察路线自述", "limits": "仅排除该车行矿路替代古道，不否定五回方向全部可能。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-d04f0aaaee50", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E67", "reason": "新闻称秦代车同轨不能独立断代路面，更不能推广到八陉全线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E67", "source_id": "BX-S53", "locator": "RTK、专项调查、新章村段", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "2026总结确认太行古陉专项调查和新章村战汉古道路发现，正文未附完整路线坐标。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2026调查总结的披露范围", "limits": "新闻称秦代车同轨不能独立断代路面，更不能推广到八陉全线。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-7f29c6b7bc55", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E11", "reason": "北平县、蒲阴县的分合不能仅凭此段重建，须对读史志和城址。", "record": { "id": "BX-E11", "source_id": "BX-S12", "locator": "定州北平县条", "quote": "本秦曲逆縣地，屬中山國，陳平封曲逆侯。後漢章帝巡嶽，以曲逆名不善，改名蒲陰縣。", "plain": "此地是秦曲逆县地，属中山国，陈平封曲逆侯；后汉章帝巡岳，因名称不善改为蒲阴县。", "claim": "元和志把曲逆、蒲阴与唐北平县沿革连述。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "唐人追述汉晋县名", "limits": "北平县、蒲阴县的分合不能仅凭此段重建，须对读史志和城址。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-c1078898d417", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E15", "reason": "古今滱水比定须另核，不能将已知通道直接命名为第七陉。", "record": { "id": "BX-E15", "source_id": "BX-S15", "locator": "卷十一·滱水·倒马关", "quote": "滱水又東逕倒馬關，關山險隘，最爲深峭，", "plain": "滱水又向东经过倒马关，关山险峻，山谷深陡。", "claim": "唐河／倒马关方向有古代通道证据。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "郦注所记北魏地理", "limits": "古今滱水比定须另核，不能将已知通道直接命名为第七陉。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "A" } }, { "id": "bx-a-dd3641d411dc", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E30", "reason": "报告概述不代替各说原著；三说证据强度不可仅按列举顺序排定。", "record": { "id": "BX-E30", "source_id": "BX-S16", "locator": "2024-06-14，网页行54—65", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "河北大学课程实践报告列三种路线解释，并选择五回岭方向进行踏查。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "现代研究／资料说明", "limits": "报告概述不代替各说原著；三说证据强度不可仅按列举顺序排定。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f3a8d07b4dc8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E34", "reason": "仅用于同名消歧；本轮不复制其坐标和政区数据。", "record": { "id": "BX-E34", "source_id": "BX-S20", "locator": "来源注：宋太平兴国元年改名蒲阴，今安国", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "今安国方向的义丰县在宋初改名蒲阴，须与汉晋曲逆蒲阴分别处理。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "现代研究／资料说明", "limits": "仅用于同名消歧；本轮不复制其坐标和政区数据。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-8d83001841eb", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E48", "reason": "今五回岭、徐水河谷及碑原址仍需比定；435记事与437立碑说分开。", "record": { "id": "BX-E48", "source_id": "BX-S38", "locator": "徐水、五回、御射三碑段", "quote": "石文云：皇帝以太延元年十二月，车驾东巡，迳五回之险邃，览崇岸之竦峙，乃停驾路侧，援弓而射之。", "plain": "碑文说，皇帝太延元年十二月东巡，经过五回的险道，观望高崖，在路旁停车取弓射箭。", "claim": "水经注将五回岭名、徐水及御射三碑连述，为五回通道及北魏东巡提供文字约束；该段没有把通道命名蒲阴陉。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "郦注所引太延元年十二月记事", "limits": "今五回岭、徐水河谷及碑原址仍需比定；435记事与437立碑说分开。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "B" } }, { "id": "bx-a-eaf49fcdd0bf", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E50", "reason": "墓砖的定州大道不等于直接出现蒲阴陉；今人线路复原不能作同时代道路坐标。", "record": { "id": "BX-E50", "source_id": "BX-S40", "locator": "原刊印页29—30", "quote": null, "plain": null, "claim": "殷宪据墓砖与史书讨论定州大道、直道及分段名；其五回与徐水解释为蒲阴比较提供另一组研究材料。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "2008研究解释北魏交通", "limits": "墓砖的定州大道不等于直接出现蒲阴陉；今人线路复原不能作同时代道路坐标。", "adoption": "web_draft", "research_grade": "C" } }, { "id": "bx-a-6dd5ea35452f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E77", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E77", "source_id": "BX-S61", "locator": "卷九十二·井陉口作战段", "quote": "信乃使萬人先行，出，背水陳。", "plain": "韩信先派一万人出阵，背水列阵。", "claim": "《史记》叙韩信、张耳出井陉口作战；可讲背水列阵，不确定对应今哪一段河岸。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "楚汉战争；确年另参BX-E83", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f9f6528cc829", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E78", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E78", "source_id": "BX-S62", "locator": "王霸传·建武十三年叙事下", "quote": "詔霸將弛刑徒六千餘人，與杜茂治飛狐道，堆石布土，築起亭障，自代至平城三百餘里。", "plain": "诏令王霸率六千多名弛刑徒，与杜茂修治飞狐道，垒石铺土并筑亭障，记述范围从代至平城三百余里。", "claim": "修道、边防与运输相连；“代至平城三百余里”不等于今飞狐峡谷这一段的长度。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "建武十三年（37）叙事下", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-51abd8ca09e2", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E79", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E79", "source_id": "BX-S63", "locator": "卷一·神武出滏口段", "quote": "神武乃自晉陽出滏口。", "plain": "高欢于是从晋阳出滏口。", "claim": "北魏末年高欢离开晋阳、东出滏口，可讲东西交通与政治行动的联系。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "北魏末年；本刊不补精确日月", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-05394bacbcaf", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E80", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E80", "source_id": "BX-S64", "locator": "诗首四句", "quote": "北上太行山，艰哉何巍巍！羊肠坂诘屈，车轮为之摧。", "plain": "北上太行，高山艰险；羊肠坂曲折，车轮也被折损。", "claim": "曹操诗描述太行行军之苦；原诗没有给出足以复原今日太行陉各节点的行程。", "grade": "A", "temporal_scope": "诗作；约206年的通行系年属后人判断", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f56df382c451", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E81", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E81", "source_id": "BX-S64", "locator": "注释①及④", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "页面注释把诗约系建安十一年（206）征高干途中；羊肠坂具体定位另有解释，不能凭诗给天井关线盖章。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "约206年", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-0c159e59be08", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E82", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E82", "source_id": "BX-S65", "locator": "项目基本情况·时代", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "北京市文物局将居庸关云台始建年代记为元至正二年至五年（1342—1345）；现存元代遗构与明代关防层次分开。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "1342—1345年", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-7a08a995356d", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E83", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E83", "source_id": "BX-S67", "locator": "正文·汉高祖三年段", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "官方地方历史介绍将井陉之战系于公元前204年；本刊只取年份及人物，不沿用精确战场和兵力断言。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "公元前204年", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-c85e8fb258b0", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E84", "reason": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "record": { "id": "BX-E84", "source_id": "BX-S66", "locator": "卷六十九·苏秦说赵段", "quote": "夫秦下軹道，則南陽危。", "plain": "如果秦军东下轵道，南阳便有危险。", "claim": "这是史书记载的战略游说语句，能说明道路的军事意义，不等于一次已经发生的行军；此处南阳也不是今日河南南阳市。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "战国；演说确年未定", "limits": "只采用本项文本／年代判断；人物事件不自动投影为本图朱线的实际行程。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-dff85c0bb835", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E85", "reason": "电子转录相关段落已读，未校版影；人物行迹不自动转成地图线位。", "record": { "id": "BX-E85", "source_id": "BX-S68", "locator": "卷123·伐西燕", "quote": "永謂垂詭道伐之，乃攝諸軍還杜太行軹關。", "plain": "慕容永认为慕容垂将从出其不意的道路进攻，于是召回各军，封守太行、轵关。", "claim": "慕容垂分遣诸军由滏口、壶关等方向进攻，慕容永收兵封守太行轵关；不能将各军合成同一路。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "394年；系年参纪要卷49太元十九年条", "limits": "电子转录相关段落已读，未校版影；人物行迹不自动转成地图线位。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-c6b4941c5c80", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E86", "reason": "轵关之名采用清初地理书追述；晋书卷100记渡河投奔刘渊而未在该段点出轵关。分清两书信息，未核沿途具体线位。", "record": { "id": "BX-E86", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "卷49·济源县·轵关", "quote": "遂走渡河，自軹關如平陽，歸劉淵。", "plain": "于是败走渡河，经轵关前往平阳，投奔刘渊。", "claim": "顾祖禹追述永嘉二年王弥攻洛阳失利后经轵关投奔刘渊；是撤退和改换政治归属的道路。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "永嘉二年，308年", "limits": "轵关之名采用清初地理书追述；晋书卷100记渡河投奔刘渊而未在该段点出轵关。分清两书信息，未核沿途具体线位。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-3f4d00d7d59f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E87", "reason": "电子转录相关段落已读，未校版影；人物行迹不自动转成地图线位。", "record": { "id": "BX-E87", "source_id": "BX-S70", "locator": "卷73·昭王四十四至四十五年", "quote": "野王降秦，上黨道絕。", "plain": "野王向秦投降，上党与韩国本土的道路断绝。", "claim": "白起攻南阳太行道、野王降秦与冯亭以上党归赵相连；交通中断改变了郡的归属及列国关系。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "秦昭王四十四至四十五年；前263—前262年", "limits": "电子转录相关段落已读，未校版影；人物行迹不自动转成地图线位。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-3936232b1712", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E88", "reason": "采用宋史的叙述，不认定现存路面就是960年工程，也不据此定位每一处负石地点。", "record": { "id": "BX-E88", "source_id": "BX-S71", "locator": "卷484·李筠传", "quote": "太祖先於馬上負數石，群臣六軍皆負之，即日平為大道。", "plain": "宋太祖先在马上背负几块石头，群臣和各军也都背石，当天把道路平整成通路。", "claim": "宋史把平李筠时扼守太行与清石通路写在同一战事段，提供临时修路与进军关系。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "建隆元年，960年", "limits": "采用宋史的叙述，不认定现存路面就是960年工程，也不据此定位每一处负石地点。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-694da7087aa7", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E89", "reason": "记事及山口名来自左传；孟门等同今天白陉的说法不提升为已证精确路线，不补齐军各支走向。", "record": { "id": "BX-E89", "source_id": "BX-S72", "locator": "襄公二十三年·秋", "quote": "齊侯遂伐晉，取朝歌，為二隊，入孟門，登大行。", "plain": "齐侯于是攻打晋国，夺取朝歌，分兵为两队，进入孟门，登上太行。", "claim": "可讲齐庄公取朝歌后进入孟门登太行；原文未用白陉名称，孟门比定另作后人解释。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "鲁襄公二十三年；前550年", "limits": "记事及山口名来自左传；孟门等同今天白陉的说法不提升为已证精确路线，不补齐军各支走向。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-bce399635316", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E90", "reason": "仅有纪行转录，原站打开超时，未校碑面或拓片；只作线索，不认定1813年始开全道，不采其全道唯一、固定货流与茶马线路之断言。", "record": { "id": "BX-E90", "source_id": "BX-S73", "locator": "纪行转录·山神祠碑", "quote": "大清嘉庆十八年二月十六日合社仝立", "plain": "大清嘉庆十八年二月十六日，由合社共同立碑。", "claim": "纪行转录一方山神祠碑的合社落款和两省要害文字，可作地方共同体与通行的线索。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "嘉庆十八年，1813年（纪行转录）", "limits": "仅有纪行转录，原站打开超时，未校碑面或拓片；只作线索，不认定1813年始开全道，不采其全道唯一、固定货流与茶马线路之断言。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-6cff15aa93fd", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E91", "reason": "只采用史书的行动与战术叙述；不将号称百万或七千当精确统计，不补埋伏地点和追击线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E91", "source_id": "BX-S74", "locator": "卷74·建义元年九月", "quote": "九月，乃率精騎七千，馬皆有副，倍道兼行，東出滏口。", "plain": "九月，尔朱荣率精锐骑兵七千，每匹马都有备用马，兼程赶路，向东出滏口。", "claim": "魏书记尔朱荣出滏口破葛荣，明言备用马与兼程；兵力为史书所记，非独立统计。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "528年；建义元年叙事", "limits": "只采用史书的行动与战术叙述；不将号称百万或七千当精确统计，不补埋伏地点和追击线。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ebad5d388135", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E92", "reason": "据研究项目对碑记的说明；未校原碑拓片，不重绘经文或造像，不推定某位工匠的实际通行路线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E92", "source_id": "BX-S75", "locator": "唐邕刻经碑的项目说明", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "研究项目据唐邕碑说明568—572年施刻经文；这是有同时代纪年的刻经与供养活动，不等同全部洞窟的创建年。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "568—572年", "limits": "据研究项目对碑记的说明；未校原碑拓片，不重绘经文或造像，不推定某位工匠的实际通行路线。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-129d329a6104", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E93", "reason": "战术建议与实际行动分开；车不得方轨是文本对通行条件的描述，不据此量定古道宽度。", "record": { "id": "BX-E93", "source_id": "BX-S61", "locator": "卷92·李左车劝陈余", "quote": "今井陘之道，車不得方軌，騎不得成列。", "plain": "如今井陉道路狭窄，车辆不能并排，骑兵不能成列。", "claim": "李左车建议以间道断汉军辎重，陈余不听；这是未实施的建议，不是已发生的断粮行动。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "前204年井陉战事语境", "limits": "战术建议与实际行动分开；车不得方轨是文本对通行条件的描述，不据此量定古道宽度。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-47b9923caf08", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E94", "reason": "诗句不代替窑址调查，不凭窑火二字判断所烧器物、窑业规模、具体地点或商货路线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E94", "source_id": "BX-S76", "locator": "井陉诗·第七至八、十七至十八句", "quote": "壑冰當路白，窯火出林青。", "plain": "山谷的冰映白道路，林间的窑火泛出青光。", "claim": "顾炎武诗中同时出现冰路、窑火、求水与短亭，可写旅人的观察，不仅是作战之险。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "明清之际；本轮不补确切作诗年", "limits": "诗句不代替窑址调查，不凭窑火二字判断所烧器物、窑业规模、具体地点或商货路线。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-01784457d92a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E95", "reason": "两个农历月份跨纪年，分开记；不将易水会师或后续幽州战事画成逐日精确线路。", "record": { "id": "BX-E95", "source_id": "BX-S77", "locator": "卷268·乾化二年正月", "quote": "春，正月，德威東出飛狐，與趙王將王德明、義武將程巖會於易水。", "plain": "春季正月，周德威向东出飞狐，与赵王部将王德明、义武军部将程岩在易水会师。", "claim": "911年十二月出兵、912年正月出飞狐并会师易水，表明飞狐与河北平原联军行动的联系。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "911年十二月—912年正月", "limits": "两个农历月份跨纪年，分开记；不将易水会师或后续幽州战事画成逐日精确线路。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-6702815fef74", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E96", "reason": "记事中的户数是史书叙述；不据此复原城郭面积，也不把县名沿革变成蒲阴陉唯一定位。", "record": { "id": "BX-E96", "source_id": "BX-S78", "locator": "卷56·高帝南过曲逆", "quote": "高帝南過曲逆，上其城，望見其屋室甚大。", "plain": "汉高帝南行经过曲逆，登上城墙，看见城中房屋规模很大。", "claim": "高帝问曲逆户口，并改封陈平为曲逆侯；它解释蒲阴候选区域的县城背景，不能证明所经道路就是第七陉。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "汉初；本轮不补绝对年份", "limits": "记事中的户数是史书叙述；不据此复原城郭面积，也不把县名沿革变成蒲阴陉唯一定位。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-a0ee36c0fa2b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E97", "reason": "仅讲紫荆关方案涉及的明代地点；孙祥传未明载作战日历，本轮不补确日或间道位置。", "record": { "id": "BX-E97", "source_id": "BX-S79", "locator": "卷167·孙祥传", "quote": "也先由間道入，夾攻之，關破。", "plain": "也先从小路进入，夹击关口，关城被攻破。", "claim": "孙祥守紫荆关、也先从间道夹攻，提供明代紫荆关战事；并不证明紫荆关即古蒲阴陉。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "正统十四年，1449年", "limits": "仅讲紫荆关方案涉及的明代地点；孙祥传未明载作战日历，本轮不补确日或间道位置。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f7f158d7f6a4", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E98", "reason": "元史只给出事件先后和关口关系；部队分合和具体绕道尚未核定，不补作全程线。", "record": { "id": "BX-E98", "source_id": "BX-S80", "locator": "卷1·太祖八年癸酉", "quote": "帝出紫荊關，敗金師于五回嶺，拔涿、易二州。", "plain": "成吉思汗从紫荆关出兵，在五回岭打败金军，攻取涿州、易州。", "claim": "元史将紫荆关、五回岭和居庸放在同一战役叙述，适合解释关口间的配合；不把这些名称合并为一条陉。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "1213年", "limits": "元史只给出事件先后和关口关系；部队分合和具体绕道尚未核定，不补作全程线。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-cc5226c5e490", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E99", "reason": "现代机构图史；采用建设区间与主持人，不把通车典礼、铺轨完成和工程区间混成同一天；未采用任何写真图版。", "record": { "id": "BX-E99", "source_id": "BX-S81", "locator": "官方图史·1905—1909年建设说明", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "詹天佑主持京张铁路，官方图史记1905—1909年建设并列居庸关隧道；是关沟交通工程的新时期。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "1905—1909年", "limits": "现代机构图史；采用建设区间与主持人，不把通车典礼、铺轨完成和工程区间混成同一天；未采用任何写真图版。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-38cdd26fe760", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BX-E100", "reason": "清初地理书的系年转述；未校版影，不增加精确行军几何。", "record": { "id": "BX-E100", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "卷49·轵关·太元十九年", "quote": "太元十九年後燕慕容垂伐西燕。", "plain": "太元十九年，后燕慕容垂攻伐西燕。", "claim": "纪要明确把轵关布防这一战事放在太元十九年，即394年；与晋书分路叙事对读。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "394年", "limits": "清初地理书的系年转述；未校版影，不增加精确行军几何。", "adoption": "web_draft" } }, { "id": "bx-a-0f6e96dcd965", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E01", "reason": "古王屋城与研究图王屋镇不能直接认作同一精确地点。", "record": { "id": "BD-E01", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "济源县·王屋城", "quote": "後周改爲王屋縣，兼置懷州治焉，州尋廢，置王屋郡。", "plain": "北周将此地改为王屋县，又曾设置怀州及王屋郡。", "claim": "王屋一带不仅有山名，也有地方行政中心的兴废。", "limits": "古王屋城与研究图王屋镇不能直接认作同一精确地点。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "济源县·王屋城", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-e83387920bd4", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E02", "reason": "古县址为原书或说；巡司是后代制度，不推广到全部古代。", "record": { "id": "BD-E02", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "济源县·邵原关", "quote": "邵原關，在縣西七十里。或曰：「故邵原縣，蓋置於此。」今有巡司。", "plain": "邵原关在当时济源县西七十里；书中对旧县位置用或说，并记有巡司。", "claim": "邵原是道路上的关防与地方治理节点。", "limits": "古县址为原书或说；巡司是后代制度，不推广到全部古代。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "济源县·邵原关", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-1c896dce8736", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E03", "reason": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "record": { "id": "BD-E03", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "济源县·沁水城附沿革", "quote": "武德二年分濟源縣置溴陽、蒸川、邵原三縣，屬西濟州。四年州廢，三縣仍併入焉。", "plain": "唐武德二年从济源分出邵原等三县，四年撤州后又并回济源。", "claim": "道路节点也会因州县设置而改变地位。", "limits": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "济源县·沁水城附沿革", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-1d81939e9e31", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E04", "reason": "里数、戍数是该书所记；不直接据此画出已核准的长城几何。", "record": { "id": "BD-E04", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "济源县·轵关·河清二年", "quote": "遣斛律光築勳掌城於軹關，仍築長城二百里，置十二戍。", "plain": "北齐派斛律光在轵关筑勋掌城，又筑长城、设十二处戍所。", "claim": "轵关的防守包含城、长城和戍所，不是一道孤立关门。", "limits": "里数、戍数是该书所记；不直接据此画出已核准的长城几何。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "济源县·轵关·河清二年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-2fbf856f4be5", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E05", "reason": "原文仅记正统年间；不填某个确年，不据此确定现存每块路石的年代。", "record": { "id": "BD-E05", "source_id": "BD-S01", "locator": "泽州·太行山·碗子城", "quote": "明朝正统中，凿石平险，以免折轴摧车之患。", "plain": "明正统年间有人凿除险石，减轻车轴折断、车辆损坏的危险。", "claim": "碗子城一带既有设防，也有为车辆通行而修整道路的记录。", "limits": "原文仅记正统年间；不填某个确年，不据此确定现存每块路石的年代。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "泽州·太行山·碗子城", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-d9f91bf69d77", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E06", "reason": "这段在即位之前，不硬系建武元年；也不补王梁逐日行军路线。", "record": { "id": "BD-E06", "source_id": "BD-S06", "locator": "王梁传·光武即位前", "quote": "拜野王令，與河內太守寇恂南拒洛陽，北守天井關。", "plain": "王梁任野王令，与河内太守寇恂一起向南抵御洛阳方向，向北守天井关。", "claim": "天井关与山南野王、河内的防守和给养形成联系。", "limits": "这段在即位之前，不硬系建武元年；也不补王梁逐日行军路线。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "王梁传·光武即位前", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-a780c112c15a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E07", "reason": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "record": { "id": "BD-E07", "source_id": "BD-S01", "locator": "陵川县·会昌三年", "quote": "王宰討澤、潞叛帥劉稹，敗稹兵於天井關，進拔陵川。", "plain": "王宰讨伐泽潞的刘稹军，在天井关获胜后又攻取陵川。", "claim": "同一战役涉及太行陉及陵川腹地，不能把后续进军自动画成白陉全程。", "limits": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "陵川县·会昌三年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-290fc6da825a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E08", "reason": "纪要称黑石岭堡；与研究图黑石岭相关，但不据此给堡墙落精确图钉。", "record": { "id": "BD-E08", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "广昌县·黑石岭堡", "quote": "正德二年，築堡於此。", "plain": "明正德二年在这里筑堡。", "claim": "黑石岭一带的明代防护设施有具体纪年。", "limits": "纪要称黑石岭堡；与研究图黑石岭相关，但不据此给堡墙落精确图钉。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "广昌县·黑石岭堡", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-26162dbf266a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E09", "reason": "原书没有列出每种货物与商号，不增补货流线路。", "record": { "id": "BD-E09", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "广昌县·黑石岭堡·转输", "quote": "商賈轉輸，道必由此，戒備不可不豫。", "plain": "商人运输货物的道路经过这里，因此必须预先防备。", "claim": "飞狐材料可以写商业转运和治安，而不只写军队穿谷。", "limits": "原书没有列出每种货物与商号，不增补货流线路。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "广昌县·黑石岭堡·转输", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-55b2c9c7642e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E10", "reason": "古县沿革不表示县治点位始终未变；今涞源只作阅读区域参照。", "record": { "id": "BD-E10", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "广昌县沿革", "quote": "隋仁壽初，改曰飛狐縣，屬易州。", "plain": "隋仁寿初将广昌县改名飞狐县，属易州。", "claim": "飞狐的县名、峡口和更大区域道路不能视作同一对象。", "limits": "古县沿革不表示县治点位始终未变；今涞源只作阅读区域参照。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "广昌县沿革", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-5e6a36e1a813", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E11", "reason": "这是明代边防讨论，不证明蒲阴陉只能比定到紫荆关。", "record": { "id": "BD-E11", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "广昌县·浮图峪", "quote": "當紫荊、倒馬二關之衝。", "plain": "浮图峪处在紫荆、倒马两关的交通要冲。", "claim": "涞源东南道路与两关防御需要合读。", "limits": "这是明代边防讨论，不证明蒲阴陉只能比定到紫荆关。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "广昌县·浮图峪", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-c3a06ccad7f1", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E12", "reason": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "record": { "id": "BD-E12", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "广昌县·宁净口", "quote": "寧淨口與浮圖峪口，景泰三年俱築堡置戍於此。", "plain": "明景泰三年在宁净口、浮图峪口筑堡并置戍。", "claim": "浮图峪的防御不只有地形，还包括明代堡与驻军。", "limits": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "广昌县·宁净口", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-58dfb44a9f03", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E13", "reason": "塔崖口、古马驿与现村的对应仍需遗址核查；不能补出精确废驿年。", "record": { "id": "BD-E13", "source_id": "BD-S04", "locator": "易州·磐石口、上陈驿", "quote": "又西二十里爲塔崖口，舊有塔崖馬驛，今廢。", "plain": "书中记磐石口以西另有塔崖口，过去设有塔崖马驿，记述时已废。", "claim": "塔崖驿是传递公文与接待驿使的制度性节点，兴废与关内上陈驿相连。", "limits": "塔崖口、古马驿与现村的对应仍需遗址核查；不能补出精确废驿年。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "易州·磐石口、上陈驿", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-d1e0f9334a8b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E14", "reason": "不把巡司迁移理解成整条滏口陉自此改道；迁移确年原段未载。", "record": { "id": "BD-E14", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "涉县·偏店关", "quote": "偏店關，縣北三十里。舊設巡司，今遷縣西南二十里吾兒峪。", "plain": "偏店关旧有巡司，后来迁到涉县西南的吾儿峪。", "claim": "同一条道路旁，治安和边防机构可以转移。", "limits": "不把巡司迁移理解成整条滏口陉自此改道；迁移确年原段未载。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "涉县·偏店关", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-937d7c449f9f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E15", "reason": "不把这条古渠与现代河网的任一细支流直接等同。", "record": { "id": "BD-E15", "source_id": "BX-S69", "locator": "涉县·漳水、通利渠", "quote": "下流入於涉河，居民資以灌溉。", "plain": "通利渠的下游流入涉河，当地居民利用它灌溉。", "claim": "涉县既是通向山西的县域节点，也有依水灌田的地方生活。", "limits": "不把这条古渠与现代河网的任一细支流直接等同。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "涉县·漳水、通利渠", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-2c28f975bae2", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E16", "reason": "该书天威城地望与现代天长介绍有出入；此条只记制度变化，不给县治唯一图钉。", "record": { "id": "BD-E16", "source_id": "BD-S03", "locator": "井陉县·熙宁复置", "quote": "宋熙寧六年省。八年復置，兼領天威軍。", "plain": "北宋熙宁六年撤省井陉县，八年恢复，并兼领天威军。", "claim": "井陉的州县制度与军政机构发生变化。", "limits": "该书天威城地望与现代天长介绍有出入；此条只记制度变化，不给县治唯一图钉。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "井陉县·熙宁复置", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-2141b3a722d1", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E17", "reason": "原书在县东北五十里记天威城，又称威州城；与今人常用天长说不完全一致，保留对读。", "record": { "id": "BD-E17", "source_id": "BD-S03", "locator": "井陉县·天威城", "quote": "熙寧八年移井陘縣治焉。", "plain": "北宋熙宁八年将井陉县治迁到书中所说的天威城。", "claim": "县治迁移需要分清天威城、威州与天长的历代地望。", "limits": "原书在县东北五十里记天威城，又称威州城；与今人常用天长说不完全一致，保留对读。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "井陉县·天威城", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-5a719305d11d", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E18", "reason": "关名沿革、建筑年代与唐代苇泽故关身份分别登记。", "record": { "id": "BD-E18", "source_id": "BD-S03", "locator": "井陉县·承天镇", "quote": "嘉靖二十一年增置官兵。明年，築城爲固，與故關相唇齒。", "plain": "嘉靖二十一年增派官兵，次年筑城加强防守，与故关彼此配合。", "claim": "明代娘子关和故关是组合防守，而非同一关门的两个名字。", "limits": "关名沿革、建筑年代与唐代苇泽故关身份分别登记。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "井陉县·承天镇", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-e0ee813ddfbd", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E19", "reason": "数量是史书所记；不把会军、东下、诸战场拼成今日道路上的精确行迹。", "record": { "id": "BD-E19", "source_id": "BD-S05", "locator": "李光弼传·天宝十五载二月", "quote": "以朔方兵五千會郭子儀軍，東下井陘，收常山郡。", "plain": "李光弼率朔方军与郭子仪会合，东下井陉，收复常山郡。", "claim": "安史战事中，井陉仍是河东向河北行动的重要通道。", "limits": "数量是史书所记；不把会军、东下、诸战场拼成今日道路上的精确行迹。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "李光弼传·天宝十五载二月", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-e4edca483849", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E20", "reason": "以本纪雍熙三年校正后出地志的雍熙二年；不将杨业故事移到飞狐线上。", "record": { "id": "BD-E20", "source_id": "BD-S08", "locator": "太宗本纪·雍熙三年正月", "quote": "田重進為定州路都部署，出飛狐。", "plain": "田重进任定州路都部署，从飞狐方向出兵。", "claim": "宋军北伐中，田重进的飞狐一路不同于潘美、杨业的雁门一路。", "limits": "以本纪雍熙三年校正后出地志的雍熙二年；不将杨业故事移到飞狐线上。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "太宗本纪·雍熙三年正月", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-de4b2a8e215e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E21", "reason": "原书军校李存璋不自动合并五代同名将领；此处不另立人物传或路线。", "record": { "id": "BD-E21", "source_id": "BD-S07", "locator": "田重进传·飞狐城与蔚州", "quote": "進攻蔚州，其牙校李存璋等殺酋帥蕭啜理、執耿紹忠，率吏民來附。", "plain": "田重进进攻蔚州时，城中军校发生行动，随后率吏民归附。", "claim": "飞狐城与蔚州的联系不仅是越山，还涉及沿途城邑和居民。", "limits": "原书军校李存璋不自动合并五代同名将领；此处不另立人物传或路线。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "田重进传·飞狐城与蔚州", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-7d837b34ead9", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E22", "reason": "记事确年未载；不复原器物尺寸，也不新画一块无原图的分水铁板。", "record": { "id": "BD-E22", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "蔚州·滋水", "quote": "金時民競爭利，鑄鐵板一片十竅，分流灌田。", "plain": "金代居民争水，便用开有十孔的铁板分水灌田。", "claim": "壶流河下游的水利分配可以与飞狐山路转运并读。", "limits": "记事确年未载；不复原器物尺寸，也不新画一块无原图的分水铁板。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "蔚州·滋水", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f1a5058523f6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E23", "reason": "后出地志记述，建筑各部分是否同年仍须考古及碑刻核对。", "record": { "id": "BD-E23", "source_id": "BX-S06", "locator": "居庸·洪武二年", "quote": "大將軍達壘石爲城，即今南口城也。", "plain": "明洪武二年，大将军徐达以石筑城，书中将其解释为南口城。", "claim": "关沟南端城防是逐步加强的，不与元代云台年代混写。", "limits": "后出地志记述，建筑各部分是否同年仍须考古及碑刻核对。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "居庸·洪武二年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-a5f9f4e8e6e7", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E24", "reason": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "record": { "id": "BD-E24", "source_id": "BD-S04", "locator": "易州·紫荆关·景泰二年", "quote": "修浚城池，益兵守禦。", "plain": "明景泰二年修整城池，并增加防守兵员。", "claim": "1449年失守后，紫荆关还有持续修治的历史。", "limits": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "易州·紫荆关·景泰二年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ff8f5692bd1a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E25", "reason": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "record": { "id": "BD-E25", "source_id": "BD-S04", "locator": "易州·紫荆关·弘治二年", "quote": "增設近關城堡。", "plain": "明弘治二年在关口附近增设城堡。", "claim": "防守从单一关门向邻近城堡展开。", "limits": "后代记述所见关系；不据里数换算古址坐标或复原完整行程。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "易州·紫荆关·弘治二年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-2b3646934197", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E26", "reason": "今人报道的茶路解释，不能给具体商号和年代补造运茶行程。页面神农、孔子传说及影片年份未采用。", "record": { "id": "BD-E26", "source_id": "BD-S10", "locator": "碗子城、拦车、天井关现场考察", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "2020年的摄影考察把碗子城、拦车、天井关与晋商茶路遗迹联系起来。", "limits": "今人报道的茶路解释，不能给具体商号和年代补造运茶行程。页面神农、孔子传说及影片年份未采用。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "碗子城、拦车、天井关现场考察", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-677d45fba191", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E27", "reason": "县治始迁1075年与另页1129年、纪要天威城地望不一致。只取相互一致的1958迁治与遗存类型，不隐去争议。", "record": { "id": "BD-E27", "source_id": "BD-S09", "locator": "天长镇·县治及遗存", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "天长保存古城、窑址及驿道等遗存；该页将县治延续至1958年。", "limits": "县治始迁1075年与另页1129年、纪要天威城地望不一致。只取相互一致的1958迁治与遗存类型，不隐去争议。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "天长镇·县治及遗存", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-033e090a23d7", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E28", "reason": "正文未成功取回；迁治方向以检索段和已读省级介绍交叉核对，仍按C级，不用于古道路面定位。", "record": { "id": "BD-E28", "source_id": "BD-S11", "locator": "检索段·1958迁微水", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "县级官网检索段明确记1958年县政府机关迁到微水镇。", "limits": "正文未成功取回；迁治方向以检索段和已读省级介绍交叉核对，仍按C级，不用于古道路面定位。", "grade": "C", "temporal_scope": "检索段·1958迁微水", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-4ce9c0d27000", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E29", "reason": "长度沿用地志记数，不据此复原完整长城线路。", "record": { "id": "BD-E29", "source_id": "BX-S06", "locator": "居庸·天保七年", "quote": "發民築長城，自幽州下口西至恒州九百餘里。", "plain": "北齐征发百姓修筑长城，书中记从幽州下口向西延至恒州。", "claim": "关口的维持依靠大规模劳役，不只是帝王与名将的行动。", "limits": "长度沿用地志记数，不据此复原完整长城线路。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "居庸·天保七年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-c60d5040f390", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E30", "reason": "为唐代书追述东汉旧事；不当作具体某年、某陉全程的运输统计。", "record": { "id": "BD-E30", "source_id": "BX-S01", "locator": "怀州·寇恂给军", "quote": "", "plain": "", "claim": "元和志追述寇恂在河内组织箭材、养马、租粮给军，说明山口防守背后依靠富庶平原。", "limits": "为唐代书追述东汉旧事；不当作具体某年、某陉全程的运输统计。", "grade": "B", "temporal_scope": "怀州·寇恂给军", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-bdba3ec8f007", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E31", "reason": "维基转录作驢東，CText与识典转录作驢車；采用驴车并保留校记，不据误字译成向东运输，也不复原具体车制。", "record": { "id": "BD-E31", "source_id": "BD-S13", "locator": "杜茂传·建武十二年叙事", "quote": "茂亦建屯田，驢車轉運。", "plain": "杜茂也组织屯田，用驴车转运物资。", "claim": "修路需要与屯田、运输及边防设施合读。", "grade": "B", "limits": "维基转录作驢東，CText与识典转录作驢車；采用驴车并保留校记，不据误字译成向东运输，也不复原具体车制。", "temporal_scope": "东汉建武年间", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-6d8e96e03ed6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E32", "reason": "北齐书作十三，纪要作十二，不强行统一，也不据二百里画现代线。", "record": { "id": "BD-E32", "source_id": "BD-S12", "locator": "斛律光传·河清二年四月", "quote": "築勳掌城於軹關西，仍築長城二百里，置十三戍。", "plain": "在轵关西筑勋掌城，又筑长城并设置十三处戍所。", "claim": "与纪要十二戍对读，保留数字差异；共同可见城、墙、戍的组合。", "grade": "B", "limits": "北齐书作十三，纪要作十二，不强行统一，也不据二百里画现代线。", "temporal_scope": "563年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-0b696d580fb7", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E33", "reason": "驿站今址及具体废置时间另核；不据古代里数直算坐标。", "record": { "id": "BD-E33", "source_id": "BD-S02", "locator": "广昌县·香山驿", "quote": "香山驛，在縣治東南。", "plain": "香山驿在当时县治的东南。", "claim": "广昌区域具有与关口相连的驿站系统。", "grade": "B", "limits": "驿站今址及具体废置时间另核；不据古代里数直算坐标。", "temporal_scope": "明清之际地志记述", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "id": "bx-a-109ee631b03c", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "adopted_evidence", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/evidence/BD-E34", "reason": "仅作分路比较，不新画雁门行军线或把两路合并。", "record": { "id": "BD-E34", "source_id": "BD-S08", "locator": "雍熙三年二月", "quote": "以檢校太師、忠武軍節度使潘美為雲、應、朔等州都部署，雲州觀察使楊業副之，出鴈門。", "plain": "任潘美为云、应、朔等州都部署，杨业为副，从雁门方向出兵。", "claim": "与田重进的飞狐一路分开，避免把杨业事迹移到飞狐线上。", "grade": "B", "limits": "仅作分路比较，不新画雁门行军线或把两路合并。", "temporal_scope": "986年", "adoption": "reading_depth" } }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/93", "reason": "建筑年代为区间，不取中点或把某年当作全路开通年", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-a3f47fa76891", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "居庸关云台1342至1345年始建", "reason": "建筑年代为区间，不取中点或把某年当作全路开通年", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E82" ] }, "id": "bx-a-e303e8217671", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/94", "reason": "约206年为后人系年；诗不是太行陉节点行程日志", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-256d4fa3b102", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "曹操苦寒行系年", "reason": "约206年为后人系年；诗不是太行陉节点行程日志", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E80", "BX-E81" ] }, "id": "bx-a-90de378c54d7", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/95", "reason": "文本明确人物与通道关系，本次未补确日或沿路几何", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-33f70ef9e928", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "高欢出滏口", "reason": "文本明确人物与通道关系，本次未补确日或沿路几何", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E79" ] }, "id": "bx-a-2768fd64dc4f", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/96", "reason": "史书记言中的战略假设，不登记为一场实际出兵事件", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-370567e8073f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "苏秦论轵道", "reason": "史书记言中的战略假设，不登记为一场实际出兵事件", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E84" ] }, "id": "bx-a-4b57dc3208b5", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/97", "reason": "原文疑字／词义未定；不建确定设备或画形制", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-466d943f5c6d", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "水斛", "reason": "原文疑字／词义未定；不建确定设备或画形制", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E27" ] }, "id": "bx-a-f04f938e4ba1", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/98", "reason": "登记生产材料语词；未制作独立器物／货运图录", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-4064c56cc5bf", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "铜与钱坊", "reason": "登记生产材料语词；未制作独立器物／货运图录", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E27" ] }, "id": "bx-a-0d6fef504743", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/99", "reason": "多说并列；不建唯一图钉", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-ed7ead73ac94", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "蒲阴唯一定位", "reason": "多说并列；不建唯一图钉", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E08", "BX-E52", "BX-E57", "BX-E64", "BX-E65", "BX-E11", "BX-E15", "BX-E30", "BX-E34", "BX-E48", "BX-E50", "BX-E96", "BX-E97" ] }, "id": "bx-a-3ae12b9408c2", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/100", "reason": "沿用原文纪年，不据碑文转引补车驾精确路线或立碑年", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-130bc95278f8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "太延元年十二月东巡御射", "reason": "沿用原文纪年，不据碑文转引补车驾精确路线或立碑年", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E48" ] }, "id": "bx-a-03c3a370cc6d", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/101", "reason": "沿用文献关系，不将数据库暂置年用作道路开通年", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-bdd55a52a6f8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "曲逆改名蒲阴", "reason": "沿用文献关系，不将数据库暂置年用作道路开通年", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E11" ] }, "id": "bx-a-2d16ab7553ce", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/102", "reason": "跨时代年代范围，不能转成某个精确始建年", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-f26603765022", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "明至清白陉遗存", "reason": "跨时代年代范围，不能转成某个精确始建年", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E21" ] }, "id": "bx-a-9ab4866c4f1b", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/103", "reason": "政府／文物局／大学／研究院／报社等按来源责任者保存，不作为人物入库", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-67b06bda76c8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "机构与刊物责任者", "reason": "政府／文物局／大学／研究院／报社等按来源责任者保存，不作为人物入库", "evidence_ids": [] }, "id": "bx-a-9c8645d55b96", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/104", "reason": "现代城镇与河名逐项登记；标注锚点不写成古址坐标，见geographic_label_mappings", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-7266001c5f33", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "地理底图标签", "reason": "现代城镇与河名逐项登记；标注锚点不写成古址坐标，见geographic_label_mappings", "evidence_ids": [] }, "id": "bx-a-ed53b4d16327", "topic": "baxing" }, { "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "source_path": "data/drafts/baxing/entity-registration.json", "source_pointer": "/attestations/105", "reason": "汉晋、唐、明清等为时段；2024论文／2022规划／2025公示等为材料年，非古道通行事件", "record": { "id": "baxing-attestation-5fa22883cef2", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "uncertainty_or_scope", "name": "时代词及编制时间", "reason": "汉晋、唐、明清等为时段；2024论文／2022规划／2025公示等为材料年，非古道通行事件", "evidence_ids": [] }, "id": "bx-a-98b8085fa20e", "topic": "baxing" }, { "id": "bx-a-60c88131df21", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "慕容永把军队调向轵关", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/0/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "yan-corridors", "period": "394年 · 山口攻防", "title": "慕容永把军队调向轵关", "text": "慕容垂进攻西燕时，先让诸军分向滏口、壶关，自己停在邺城西南。慕容永疑他另择道路进攻，于是收兵封守太行、轵关；慕容垂随后由天井关入山。几处山口出现在同一战役中，守住一关还要判断对方从哪里来。各军分路，是读这场战争时不能省掉的一层。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E85", "BX-E100" ], "source_label": "《晋书·慕容垂载记》／《纪要》", "people": [ "慕容垂", "慕容永", "慕容楷", "慕容农" ], "places": [ "邺城", "壶关", "天井关", "长子", "后燕", "西燕" ], "years": [ 394 ], "works": [], "event": "慕容垂攻西燕与诸关布防", "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-d45f3a65fdae", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "王弥渡河以后", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/0/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "wang-mi-retreat", "period": "308年 · 败退与归附", "title": "王弥渡河以后", "text": "王弥逼近洛阳，被击退后转而投奔刘渊。《晋书》写他渡河归附，《读史方舆纪要》进一步写出轵关至平阳的联系。山口也承接败军和归附者的流动；洛阳与平阳之间的联系，因此有了一个具体人物的去向。轵关这一途经地，采用的是后出地理书的追述。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E86" ], "source_label": "《读史方舆纪要》卷四十九", "people": [ "王弥", "刘渊" ], "places": [ "洛阳", "平阳" ], "years": [ 308 ], "works": [], "event": "王弥败退后经轵关归附刘渊", "display_order": 1 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-1c018dffc563", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "野王一降，上党道绝", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/1/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "shangdang-cut", "period": "前263—前262年 · 道路与郡县", "title": "野王一降，上党道绝", "text": "《史记》先记白起攻南阳太行道，次年记野王降秦、上党道绝。上党守冯亭判断，韩国已无法接应，转而谋求把上党交给赵国；赵国君臣对是否接收发生争论。过山道路一旦被截断，山上的郡就难以继续依靠山南的朝廷。这是长平战事之前的一连串选择，须与后来战场分开读。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E87" ], "source_label": "《史记·白起王翦列传》", "people": [ "白起", "冯亭", "赵孝成王" ], "places": [ "野王", "上党", "长平", "秦国（战国）", "韩国（战国）", "赵国（战国）" ], "years": [ -263, -262 ], "works": [], "event": "秦攻太行道与野王降秦", "year_range": [ -263, -262 ], "display_order": 0 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-238eafc0f580", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "赵匡胤与背石的军队", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/1/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "song-roadwork", "period": "960年 · 临时修路", "title": "赵匡胤与背石的军队", "text": "李筠据泽、潞反宋，赵匡胤命军队扼住太行隘口，自己随后亲征。《宋史》记山道多石难行，他先在马上负石，群臣和军士跟随清理，打通道路后再与前军会合。史书把皇帝与军队一起修路写成一段：山险既影响防守，也限制援军和进攻者的速度。现存路面则还要按自己的遗存年代判断。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E88" ], "source_label": "《宋史·李筠传》", "people": [ "赵匡胤", "李筠", "石守信", "高怀德" ], "places": [ "泽州", "潞州" ], "years": [ 960 ], "works": [], "event": "宋太祖征李筠及清石通路", "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-fdda9e2ad218", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "齐庄公从朝歌进入孟门", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/2/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "qi-duke-mengmen", "period": "前550年 · 古名与战事", "title": "齐庄公从朝歌进入孟门", "text": "《左传》写齐庄公取朝歌后，分兵两队，进入孟门、登上太行；前文还有晏婴对这次用兵的劝阻。后来的地理解释常把孟门联系到白陉，但春秋文本没有写“白陉”。这段早期记载可以说明晋、齐争战中的山口行动，也提醒我们：同一场战争的旧地名，需要经过比定才能放到今天的地图上。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E89" ], "source_label": "《左传·襄公二十三年》", "people": [ "齐庄公（姜光）", "晏婴" ], "places": [ "朝歌", "孟门", "齐国（春秋）", "晋国（春秋）" ], "years": [ -550 ], "works": [], "event": "齐庄公取朝歌后入孟门登太行", "display_order": 0 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-303813d3ce96", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "山路旁为什么留下共同立碑", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/2/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "community-stele", "period": "1813年纪行转录 · 山神祠与合社", "title": "山路旁为什么留下共同立碑", "text": "一篇白陉纪行转录七十二拐旁山神祠碑，称此处当两省往来的要害，并记嘉庆十八年“合社仝立”。这让视线从领兵者移到沿路共同体：长年通行的山路旁，也有祠庙和共同立碑的人。碑面与完整文字还未校核，目前只采用纪行留下的这一线索；不据此断言整条古道的开凿年或固定货物流向。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E90" ], "source_label": "白陉纪行所录山神祠碑", "people": [], "places": [ "七十二拐" ], "years": [], "works": [ "白陉山神祠碑" ], "year_range": [ 1813, 1813 ], "date_note": "1813来自纪行转录，进入证据层，不建已核立碑事件", "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "1813来自纪行转录，进入证据层，不建已核立碑事件" }, { "id": "bx-a-56731b2b18e0", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "尔朱荣带着备用马出滏口", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/3/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "erzhu-ge", "period": "528年 · 骑兵出山", "title": "尔朱荣带着备用马出滏口", "text": "《魏书》记尔朱荣率骑兵东出滏口，马匹另有备用，兼程赶往河北，迎击葛荣。他把部队分散藏在山谷，以扬尘和鼓噪使对手难测人数，随后合击取胜。备用马、行军速度和分兵方式，都写在叙事里。滏口在这里联系着晋阳的骑兵与河北的战局；军数仍按史书记载阅读，不当作独立统计。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E91" ], "source_label": "《魏书·尔朱荣传》", "people": [ "尔朱荣", "葛荣" ], "places": [ "晋阳", "邺城" ], "years": [ 528 ], "works": [], "event": "尔朱荣东出滏口击败葛荣", "display_order": 0 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-02f8cd442b61", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "唐邕把经文刻进山崖", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/3/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "tang-yong-inscription", "period": "568—572年 · 佛教刻经", "title": "唐邕把经文刻进山崖", "text": "响堂山位于北齐都城邺附近。芝加哥大学刻经项目据唐邕碑说明，这位北齐官员在568至572年间资助刻凿佛经。有供养者、经文和纪年，山口旁的历史便不只由战事组成，也有官员与佛教团体参与的营建。这个区间属于唐邕刻经活动，不能代作整组石窟的统一开凿年。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E92" ], "source_label": "响堂山石窟刻经项目·唐邕碑", "people": [ "唐邕" ], "places": [ "响堂山石窟", "北齐" ], "years": [], "works": [], "event": "唐邕资助响堂山刻经", "year_range": [ 568, 572 ], "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-67ea3f5948b4", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "李左车算的是粮道", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/4/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "li-zuoche-supply", "period": "前204年 · 未被采用的军议", "title": "李左车算的是粮道", "text": "背水列阵之前，李左车先谈汉军的补给。他指出井陉道狭窄，车骑不能并行，长队的粮食必落在后面，建议从间道断其辎重，同时坚壁不战。陈余没有听从，韩信得知这一点后才继续前进。名将的胜负之外，这段对话还留下了山道运输的难题；李左车的断粮方案始终是未实施的建议。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E93" ], "source_label": "《史记·淮阴侯列传》", "people": [ "李左车", "陈余", "韩信" ], "places": [], "years": [], "works": [], "display_order": 0 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-11eea965dfd4", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "顾炎武看见林间窑火", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/4/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "gu-yanwu-travel", "period": "明清之际 · 行旅与生产", "title": "顾炎武看见林间窑火", "text": "顾炎武的《井陉》先谈史册中的权谋，又写眼前冰路与林间窑火，末段写向孤戍求水、在短亭煮藜。山路上有旅人的饥渴，也有当地生产的火光。诗句使这片过山区域显出军议之外的日常；“窑火”究竟对应哪处窑址、烧造何物，还须另据窑业材料核对。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E94" ], "source_label": "顾炎武《井陉》", "people": [ "顾炎武" ], "places": [], "years": [], "works": [ "顾亭林诗集" ], "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-af66f886aef0", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "周德威从飞狐走向易水", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/5/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "zhou-dewei-east", "period": "911—912年 · 越山会师", "title": "周德威从飞狐走向易水", "text": "《资治通鉴》把行动分在两个纪年里：911年十二月，晋王派周德威出兵救易定；912年正月，周德威东出飞狐，与王德明、程岩在易水会师，再攻燕地。飞狐联系的范围因而越出谷口本身，延伸到河北诸镇的合作与对抗。出兵、出山和会师各有先后，不应压缩成一个含糊的年份。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E95" ], "source_label": "《资治通鉴》卷二百六十八", "people": [ "周德威", "李存勖", "刘守光", "王德明", "程岩", "王镕" ], "places": [ "易水", "易州", "定州", "幽州", "义武军" ], "years": [ 911, 912 ], "works": [], "event": "周德威出兵攻燕并东出飞狐", "year_range": [ 911, 912 ], "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-759abca9ddf8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "拒马河水怎样进入生产记载", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/5/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "mint-water", "period": "812年记事 · 冶铜与钱坊", "title": "拒马河水怎样进入生产记载", "text": "《元和郡县图志》在飞狐县记三河冶与钱坊相距二十五里，又说两处同用拒马河水。冶址、钱坊和水，构成另一种读通道的方法：先找生产活动之间的联系，再问道路如何把它们接在一起。现有文字未说铜料沿哪条路运输；原文“水斛”一词也待校，不能据此画出一套已经确定的水力设备。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E27" ], "source_label": "《元和郡县图志》飞狐县", "people": [], "places": [ "三河冶", "飞狐钱坊", "拒马河" ], "years": [], "works": [], "display_order": 1 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-8433d71c199f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "刘邦登上曲逆城", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/6/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "quni-city", "period": "汉初 · 县城与封邑", "title": "刘邦登上曲逆城", "text": "《史记》记刘邦南行经过曲逆，登城见到规模颇大的房屋，询问户口；随后改封陈平为曲逆侯。唐人地理书又把曲逆、蒲阴的县名沿革连在一起。县城、封邑和后来的改名，使第七陉候选区域有了更厚的历史背景。这里能确定的是文本中的曲逆县城，尚不能由此选定一条“蒲阴陉”古道。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E96", "BX-E11" ], "source_label": "《史记·陈丞相世家》／《元和志》", "people": [ "刘邦", "陈平" ], "places": [ "曲逆县" ], "years": [], "works": [], "event": "刘邦过曲逆并改封陈平", "display_order": 0 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-039b91e9a63a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "孙祥守关与关外的间道", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/6/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "sun-xiang-pass", "period": "1449年 · 紫荆关战事", "title": "孙祥守关与关外的间道", "text": "在本刊地图采用的紫荆关方案中，可以读到一场有明确人物的明代战事。《明史》记孙祥守紫荆关，也先由间道进入、夹攻关城；关破后孙祥督兵巷战而死，一度还被误报为弃城。关防既要守正面，也受侧后道路影响。这段属于紫荆关的历史，不能反过来替“紫荆关就是古蒲阴陉”作证明。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E97" ], "source_label": "《明史·孙祥传》", "people": [ "孙祥", "也先", "韩青" ], "places": [ "紫荆关" ], "years": [ 1449 ], "works": [], "event": "孙祥守紫荆关战死", "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-fab98d191990", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "居庸未下，战事转向别处", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/7/history_more/0", "record": { "id": "mongol-passes", "period": "1213年 · 诸关之间", "title": "居庸未下，战事转向别处", "text": "《元史》记金兵保守居庸时，成吉思汗留下军队相持，随后从紫荆关出兵，在五回岭击败金军。另一段又记北口被献，哲别取居庸并与留守军队会合。关沟的险要要放到邻近通道一起看：一座关城仍在，其他出入口和军队的分合却可能改变它的处境。文献先后不等于已知所有部队的完整绕道路线。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E98" ], "source_label": "《元史·太祖本纪》", "people": [ "成吉思汗", "哲别" ], "places": [ "居庸关", "紫荆关", "五回岭", "北口（居庸）", "金朝", "蒙古政权" ], "years": [ 1213 ], "works": [], "event": "蒙古攻金与居庸诸关战事", "display_order": 0 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-b50f291a01d6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "history_time_and_scope", "name": "詹天佑面对的另一种山险", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/chapters/7/history_more/1", "record": { "id": "railway-zhang", "period": "1905—1909年 · 铁路工程", "title": "詹天佑面对的另一种山险", "text": "詹天佑主持京张铁路建设时，南口以北的关沟又面对新的通行要求。铁路需要坡度、曲线、桥梁与隧道；国家铁路局所载图史列出居庸关隧道，并记建设期间拍成《京张路工撮影》。旧关城与新交通工程由此叠在同一过山区域。铁路有自己的线位与工程年代，不能直接当作古道的延长线。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E99" ], "source_label": "国家铁路局《百年京张 世纪经典》", "people": [ "詹天佑" ], "places": [ "京张铁路", "居庸关隧道" ], "years": [], "works": [ "京张路工撮影" ], "event": "詹天佑主持京张铁路建设", "year_range": [ 1905, 1909 ], "display_order": 2 }, "reason": "时段、范围、文学观察、假设军议和已发生事件按本条元数据分开；不新增行军线。" }, { "id": "bx-a-7477c83e02ec", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/0", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-f409181cb5", "title": "三河冶与飞狐钱坊同用拒马河水的记载", "routes": [ "feihu" ], "time_text": "812年", "summary": "文献记事年，不是遗址建成年", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E27" ], "people": [], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 812, "event_name": "三河冶与飞狐钱坊同用拒马河水的记载" } }, { "id": "bx-a-139fbc2a72c9", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/1", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-024ee6d0c8", "title": "井陉东段官道改北而南", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "1618年", "summary": "今人研究所系事件", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E63" ], "people": [], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1618, "event_name": "井陉东段官道改北而南" } }, { "id": "bx-a-b025d4099404", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/2", "reason": "range；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-c261c984e6", "title": "周德威出兵攻燕并东出飞狐", "routes": [ "feihu" ], "time_text": "911—912年", "summary": "《资治通鉴》把行动分在两个纪年里：911年十二月，晋王派周德威出兵救易定；912年正月，周德威东出飞狐，与王德明、程岩在易水会师，再攻燕地。飞狐联系的范围因而越出谷口本身，延伸到河北诸镇的合作与对抗。出兵、出山和会师各有先后，不应压缩成一个含糊的年份。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E95" ], "people": [ "周德威" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "range", "from": 911, "to": 912, "event_name": "周德威出兵攻燕并东出飞狐" } }, { "id": "bx-a-1ef28d4b9b8c", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/3", "reason": "range；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-0b38248e37", "title": "唐邕资助响堂山刻经", "routes": [ "fukou" ], "time_text": "568—572年", "summary": "响堂山位于北齐都城邺附近。芝加哥大学刻经项目据唐邕碑说明，这位北齐官员在568至572年间资助刻凿佛经。有供养者、经文和纪年，山口旁的历史便不只由战事组成，也有官员与佛教团体参与的营建。这个区间属于唐邕刻经活动，不能代作整组石窟的统一开凿年。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E92" ], "people": [ "唐邕" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "range", "from": 568, "to": 572, "event_name": "唐邕资助响堂山刻经" } }, { "id": "bx-a-8d9f122a6ee2", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/4", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-474fa7445e", "title": "娘子关设防及相关道路变化", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "1542年", "summary": "今人研究所系事件，不是全路始建年", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E63" ], "people": [], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1542, "event_name": "娘子关设防及相关道路变化" } }, { "id": "bx-a-d297224885a1", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/5", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-df69a19bef", "title": "孙祥守紫荆关战死", "routes": [ "puyin" ], "time_text": "1449年", "summary": "在本刊地图采用的紫荆关方案中，可以读到一场有明确人物的明代战事。《明史》记孙祥守紫荆关，也先由间道进入、夹攻关城；关破后孙祥督兵巷战而死，一度还被误报为弃城。关防既要守正面，也受侧后道路影响。这段属于紫荆关的历史，不能反过来替“紫荆关就是古蒲阴陉”作证明。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E97" ], "people": [ "孙祥" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1449, "event_name": "孙祥守紫荆关战死" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f57b68492572", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/6", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-71e68f2119", "title": "宋太祖征李筠及清石通路", "routes": [ "taihang" ], "time_text": "960年", "summary": "李筠据泽、潞反宋，赵匡胤命军队扼住太行隘口，自己随后亲征。《宋史》记山道多石难行，他先在马上负石，群臣和军士跟随清理，打通道路后再与前军会合。史书把皇帝与军队一起修路写成一段：山险既影响防守，也限制援军和进攻者的速度。现存路面则还要按自己的遗存年代判断。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E88" ], "people": [ "赵匡胤" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 960, "event_name": "宋太祖征李筠及清石通路" } }, { "id": "bx-a-6c73e89e369e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/7", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-8db5a5147f", "title": "尔朱荣东出滏口击败葛荣", "routes": [ "fukou" ], "time_text": "528年", "summary": "《魏书》记尔朱荣率骑兵东出滏口，马匹另有备用，兼程赶往河北，迎击葛荣。他把部队分散藏在山谷，以扬尘和鼓噪使对手难测人数，随后合击取胜。备用马、行军速度和分兵方式，都写在叙事里。滏口在这里联系着晋阳的骑兵与河北的战局；军数仍按史书记载阅读，不当作独立统计。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E91" ], "people": [ "尔朱荣" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 528, "event_name": "尔朱荣东出滏口击败葛荣" } }, { "id": "bx-a-9807c8b7d0f6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/8", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-f2b23894b9", "title": "慕容垂攻西燕与诸关布防", "routes": [ "zhiguan" ], "time_text": "394年", "summary": "慕容垂进攻西燕时，先让诸军分向滏口、壶关，自己停在邺城西南。慕容永疑他另择道路进攻，于是收兵封守太行、轵关；慕容垂随后由天井关入山。几处山口出现在同一战役中，守住一关还要判断对方从哪里来。各军分路，是读这场战争时不能省掉的一层。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E100", "BX-E85" ], "people": [ "慕容垂" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 394, "event_name": "慕容垂攻西燕与诸关布防" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ea44556d2444", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/9", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-b224bd466f", "title": "王弥败退后经轵关归附刘渊", "routes": [ "zhiguan" ], "time_text": "308年", "summary": "王弥逼近洛阳，被击退后转而投奔刘渊。《晋书》写他渡河归附，《读史方舆纪要》进一步写出轵关至平阳的联系。山口也承接败军和归附者的流动；洛阳与平阳之间的联系，因此有了一个具体人物的去向。轵关这一途经地，采用的是后出地理书的追述。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E86" ], "people": [], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 308, "event_name": "王弥败退后经轵关归附刘渊" } }, { "id": "bx-a-4680ce05c08b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/10", "reason": "year_context_not_exact_date；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-fabfa3cad2", "title": "王霸与杜茂修治飞狐道", "routes": [ "feihu" ], "time_text": "37年", "summary": "《后汉书》在建武十三年叙事下记：王霸率六千余弛刑徒，与杜茂修治飞狐道，堆石铺土、筑亭设障。道路依靠具体的人力维持，也服务于边防运输；书中“代至平城三百余里”的范围，不能缩成眼前这一段峡谷。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E78" ], "people": [ "王霸", "杜茂" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year_context_not_exact_date", "from": 37, "event_name": "王霸与杜茂修治飞狐道" } }, { "id": "bx-a-13d29aad69d6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/11", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-143a12ad86", "title": "白陉古道列入省级文保名录", "routes": [ "bai" ], "time_text": "2021年", "summary": "横水至双底的古道路面，把通道历史落到可保护的实物上。2021年山西省文保名录登记其年代为明至清；道路可能更早沿用，现存石阶的年代仍须分别判断。村落间的石阶和路面，留下了通行与维护的实物痕迹。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E21" ], "people": [], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 2021, "event_name": "白陉古道列入省级文保名录" } }, { "id": "bx-a-f8597c78dbe5", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/12", "reason": "range；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-776f49f51f", "title": "秦攻太行道与野王降秦", "routes": [ "taihang" ], "time_text": "-263—-262年", "summary": "《史记》先记白起攻南阳太行道，次年记野王降秦、上党道绝。上党守冯亭判断，韩国已无法接应，转而谋求把上党交给赵国；赵国君臣对是否接收发生争论。过山道路一旦被截断，山上的郡就难以继续依靠山南的朝廷。这是长平战事之前的一连串选择，须与后来战场分开读。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E87" ], "people": [ "白起" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "range", "from": -263, "to": -262, "event_name": "秦攻太行道与野王降秦" } }, { "id": "bx-a-b9a805da95e6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/13", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-6ee2512be0", "title": "蒙古攻金与居庸诸关战事", "routes": [ "jundu" ], "time_text": "1213年", "summary": "《元史》记金兵保守居庸时，成吉思汗留下军队相持，随后从紫荆关出兵，在五回岭击败金军。另一段又记北口被献，哲别取居庸并与留守军队会合。关沟的险要要放到邻近通道一起看：一座关城仍在，其他出入口和军队的分合却可能改变它的处境。文献先后不等于已知所有部队的完整绕道路线。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E98" ], "people": [], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1213, "event_name": "蒙古攻金与居庸诸关战事" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ab85b50c92fe", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/14", "reason": "range；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-d2726a721b", "title": "詹天佑主持京张铁路建设", "routes": [ "jundu" ], "time_text": "1905—1909年", "summary": "詹天佑主持京张铁路建设时，南口以北的关沟又面对新的通行要求。铁路需要坡度、曲线、桥梁与隧道；国家铁路局所载图史列出居庸关隧道，并记建设期间拍成《京张路工撮影》。旧关城与新交通工程由此叠在同一过山区域。铁路有自己的线位与工程年代，不能直接当作古道的延长线。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E99" ], "people": [ "詹天佑" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "range", "from": 1905, "to": 1909, "event_name": "詹天佑主持京张铁路建设" } }, { "id": "bx-a-8ba78e62bd9f", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/15", "reason": "year_context_not_exact_date；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-85f58d3850", "title": "韩信与张耳井陉破赵", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "前204年", "summary": "韩信与张耳攻赵，成为井陉最著名的历史一页。《史记》记汉军背水列阵，出井陉口接战，并以轻骑袭入赵营。文献能讲清战术过程；所背河流、各营位置及今日对应点，仍须另外考证。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E77", "BX-E83" ], "people": [ "韩信" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year_context_not_exact_date", "from": -204, "event_name": "韩信与张耳井陉破赵" } }, { "id": "bx-a-66ad6d3e92e0", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/16", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-9fc5689912", "title": "齐庄公取朝歌后入孟门登太行", "routes": [ "bai" ], "time_text": "前550年", "summary": "《左传》写齐庄公取朝歌后，分兵两队，进入孟门、登上太行；前文还有晏婴对这次用兵的劝阻。后来的地理解释常把孟门联系到白陉，但春秋文本没有写“白陉”。这段早期记载可以说明晋、齐争战中的山口行动，也提醒我们：同一场战争的旧地名，需要经过比定才能放到今天的地图上。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E89" ], "people": [ "齐庄公（姜光）" ], "places": [], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": -550, "event_name": "齐庄公取朝歌后入孟门登太行" } }, { "id": "bx-a-4ad5fb81457d", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/17", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-699f601816", "title": "北齐在轵关筑勋掌城与戍所", "routes": [ "zhiguan" ], "time_text": "563年", "summary": "北齐书与纪要均记筑城及长城，戍数十三／十二的差异保留。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E04", "BD-E32" ], "people": [ "斛律光" ], "places": [ "轵关" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 563 } }, { "id": "bx-a-13fe4c7faa74", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/18", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-c5041fcc49", "title": "唐析置邵原县", "routes": [ "zhiguan" ], "time_text": "619年", "summary": "唐武德二年分济源置邵原等三县。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E03" ], "people": [], "places": [ "邵原" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 619 } }, { "id": "bx-a-0de86ac517ce", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/19", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-a8a9944dd9", "title": "邵原等三县并回济源", "routes": [ "zhiguan" ], "time_text": "621年", "summary": "武德四年西济州废，三县并入济源。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E03" ], "people": [], "places": [ "邵原", "济源" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 621 } }, { "id": "bx-a-28415bbf2dbf", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/20", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-85db4e9e0c", "title": "王宰破天井关后进取陵川", "routes": [ "taihang", "bai" ], "time_text": "843年", "summary": "一场战事联系天井关和陵川，不据此判定白陉全程行军。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E07" ], "people": [ "王宰" ], "places": [ "天井关", "陵川" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 843 } }, { "id": "bx-a-01063528b6ab", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/21", "reason": "range；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-1dc2d2e702", "title": "明正统年间碗子城一带凿石平险", "routes": [ "taihang" ], "time_text": "正统年间（1436—1449）", "summary": "地志只给年号范围，工程具体年份未载。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E05" ], "people": [], "places": [ "碗子城" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "range", "from": 1436, "to": 1449 } }, { "id": "bx-a-9dc21271429a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/22", "reason": "undated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-499c7d7b46", "title": "王梁与寇恂分守河内和天井关", "routes": [ "taihang" ], "time_text": "东汉建立前后，确年未载", "summary": "守关叙事在光武即位之前，不填建武元年。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E06" ], "people": [ "王梁", "寇恂" ], "places": [ "河内", "天井关" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "undated" } }, { "id": "bx-a-9ead826336a6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/23", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-8b479dccfd", "title": "李光弼与郭子仪东下井陉", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "756年", "summary": "旧唐书明确记天宝十五载二月东下，随后战事转向常山。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E19" ], "people": [ "李光弼", "郭子仪" ], "places": [ "井陉" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 756 } }, { "id": "bx-a-685eb80d7c19", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/24", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-fee4fc1550", "title": "井陉县复置并兼领天威军", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "1075年", "summary": "制度变动有文献纪年；县治与天威城具体地望仍对读。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E16", "BD-E17" ], "people": [], "places": [ "井陉县" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1075 } }, { "id": "bx-a-d1a8d79fc4f7", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/25", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-b649ba99a9", "title": "娘子关增兵后筑城", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "1543年", "summary": "纪要记嘉靖二十一年增兵，明年筑城。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E18" ], "people": [], "places": [ "娘子关" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1543 } }, { "id": "bx-a-09d2ba9524a8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/26", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-735b55ccc4", "title": "井陉县政府迁往微水", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "1958年", "summary": "县级检索段与省级说明交叉核对；属于现代行政中心变化。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E27", "BD-E28" ], "people": [], "places": [ "天长", "微水" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1958 } }, { "id": "bx-a-8f0db33cef16", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/27", "reason": "disputed；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-729c61eaa6", "title": "天长县治始迁年代与天威城地望", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "1075／1129年说及地望待核", "summary": "同一现代介绍还有不同年份；不把二说当作两次已证迁治。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E27", "BD-E17", "BD-E16" ], "people": [], "places": [ "天长", "威州" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "disputed" } }, { "id": "bx-a-62cbe833a998", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/28", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-c6bebffb04", "title": "田重进从飞狐出兵北伐", "routes": [ "feihu" ], "time_text": "986年", "summary": "用宋史本纪三年条校正后出地志二年条；与雁门一路区别。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E20", "BD-E21" ], "people": [ "田重进" ], "places": [ "飞狐县", "蔚县" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 986 } }, { "id": "bx-a-62a5f4f471c3", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/29", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-d31965732b", "title": "黑石岭筑堡护路", "routes": [ "feihu" ], "time_text": "1507年", "summary": "纪要记正德二年筑堡；同条强调商贾转输的治安需要。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E08", "BD-E09" ], "people": [], "places": [ "黑石岭堡", "黑石岭" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1507 } }, { "id": "bx-a-484780c94e99", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/30", "reason": "undated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-cae7e6f616", "title": "金代盆地居民以十孔铁板分水灌田", "routes": [ "feihu" ], "time_text": "金代，确年未载", "summary": "地志保留用水分配的具体做法，不把整个金代起讫当工程区间。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E22" ], "people": [], "places": [ "壶流河", "蔚县" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "undated" } }, { "id": "bx-a-d8dfe7bb9b24", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/31", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-3fd335bd6e", "title": "紫荆关修城增兵", "routes": [ "puyin" ], "time_text": "1451年", "summary": "地志记景泰二年修浚城池，益兵防守。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E24" ], "people": [], "places": [ "紫荆关" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1451 } }, { "id": "bx-a-e9bcb21a36c6", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/32", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-00f1543f3b", "title": "浮图峪口筑堡置戍", "routes": [ "puyin" ], "time_text": "1452年", "summary": "地志将浮图峪口与宁净口同列景泰三年筑堡。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E12" ], "people": [], "places": [ "浮图峪" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1452 } }, { "id": "bx-a-a401961f849e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/33", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-60227be7ff", "title": "紫荆关附近增设城堡", "routes": [ "puyin" ], "time_text": "1489年", "summary": "弘治二年的记载显示关外防守继续加密。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E25" ], "people": [], "places": [ "紫荆关" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1489 } }, { "id": "bx-a-b024d8db5d8b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/34", "reason": "undated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-031e9f457e", "title": "塔崖马驿废并的记载", "routes": [ "puyin" ], "time_text": "明清之际地志记述，废驿确年未载", "summary": "塔崖与上陈驿、关城内驿站的变化分开记，不造废驿年。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E13" ], "people": [], "places": [ "塔崖驿", "紫荆关" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "undated" } }, { "id": "bx-a-ab7418a7a69e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/35", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-28fa29df9f", "title": "北齐从幽州下口起筑长城", "routes": [ "jundu" ], "time_text": "556年", "summary": "后出地志天保七年记徭役筑城，长度不转为地图几何。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E29" ], "people": [], "places": [ "南口" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 556 } }, { "id": "bx-a-fdcecf26b030", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/36", "reason": "year；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-86eedf2d91", "title": "徐达以石筑南口城", "routes": [ "jundu" ], "time_text": "1369年", "summary": "纪要洪武二年条追述南口筑城。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E23" ], "people": [ "徐达" ], "places": [ "南口" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "year", "from": 1369 } }, { "id": "bx-a-ca69175c72a1", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/37", "reason": "range；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-1f35adb6b7", "title": "居庸关云台的建设区间", "routes": [ "jundu" ], "time_text": "1342—1345年", "summary": "官方文物材料给区间，不取中点，也不当全部关城始建年。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E82" ], "people": [], "places": [ "居庸关" ], "public_event": true, "precision": "range", "from": 1342, "to": 1345 } }, { "id": "bx-a-527e66379c07", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/38", "reason": "reported_date；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-02aace6168", "title": "白陉山神祠合社碑款的转录", "routes": [ "bai" ], "time_text": "1813年碑款，原碑未校", "summary": "采用纪行转录所见纪年，原碑或旧拓未获，仍是材料记录。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E90" ], "people": [], "places": [ "双底" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "reported_date" } }, { "id": "bx-a-dfa5809ff08b", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/39", "reason": "undated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-af9a860a8a", "title": "顾炎武的井陉行旅观察", "routes": [ "jingxing" ], "time_text": "明清之际，未取确年", "summary": "冰路、窑火、求水与短亭，是诗中旅人的观察。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E94" ], "people": [ "顾炎武" ], "places": [ "土门", "天长" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "undated" } }, { "id": "bx-a-cf6a7cae21e0", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/40", "reason": "estimated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-56aea35438", "title": "曹操苦寒行与山路艰辛", "routes": [ "taihang" ], "time_text": "后人约系206年", "summary": "约系年代不变成诗中每一地点的精确行程。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E80", "BX-E81" ], "people": [ "曹操" ], "places": [ "天井关" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "estimated" } }, { "id": "bx-a-dee7e446a6a8", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/41", "reason": "undated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-721dc827f4", "title": "孟门与白陉古名关系", "routes": [ "bai" ], "time_text": "前550年叙事，通道同一关系另核", "summary": "左传用孟门，未用白陉；取朝歌登太行的叙事不替代古道比定。", "evidence_ids": [ "BX-E89" ], "people": [], "places": [ "薄壁" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "undated" } }, { "id": "bx-a-9a16e529d7f4", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "reading_chronology", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/chronology/42", "reason": "undated；地方记事、文字材料、异说及实际行动分开。", "record": { "id": "rt-7b349a1e23", "title": "茶路遗迹的当代考察", "routes": [ "taihang" ], "time_text": "明清商路解释，具体商队年代未定", "summary": "2020年考察报道把常平、碗子城、拦车与天井关并读。报道年不变成古代运输事件年。", "evidence_ids": [ "BD-E26" ], "people": [], "places": [ "常平", "碗子城", "拦车", "天井关" ], "public_event": false, "precision": "undated" } }, { "id": "bx-s-424d40c2f313", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-GEO-ROUTES", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "2024年研究复原图的制图采用", "source_ids": [ "BX-GEO-ROUTES" ], "record": { "id": "BX-GEO-ROUTES", "title": "2024年研究复原图的制图采用", "url": "https://jchla.ijournals.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20240604&flag=1", "description": "王子尧、林箐、王向荣《中国园林》40(6):28–34，图2／3。逐幅提取原图朱线，依现代控制点作北向朝上的分轴配准；控制残差不等，不是调查精度，也未检定全部节点的绝对误差。图示采用的时间范围未细分；蒲阴展示该文紫荆关方案，另外两说在关系视图对读。", "credit": "路线地理图为C层研究复原转绘；八条完整古道线位和蒲阴唯一定位仍未定案。", "license_url": null, "author": "数据责任者见署名", "locator": "地形／水系／现代聚落和研究图制图依据", "read_state": "制图说明与实际区域数据已读取；详见research/geo", "limits": "王子尧、林箐、王向荣《中国园林》40(6):28–34，图2／3。逐幅提取原图朱线，依现代控制点作北向朝上的分轴配准；控制残差不等，不是调查精度，也未检定全部节点的绝对误差。图示采用的时间范围未细分；蒲阴展示该文紫荆关方案，另外两说在关系视图对读。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-67b9a4bece3e", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S20", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "CHGIS义丰县记录hvd_44781", "source_ids": [ "BX-S20" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S20", "title": "CHGIS义丰县记录hvd_44781", "author": "Harvard University and Fudan University", "url": "https://tgaz.fudan.edu.cn/tgaz/placename/hvd_44781", "locator": "来源注：宋太平兴国元年改名蒲阴，今安国", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25T13:11:00+08:00", "read_state": "整条已读", "limits": "用于区分宋代同名县；不将安国蒲阴与汉晋曲逆蒲阴合并。未导入坐标。", "web_refs": [ "turn14view2" ], "license": "CC BY-NC 4.0；本轮仅引用说明" } }, { "id": "bx-s-048345ea2f61", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-GEO-GN", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "GeoNames CN gazetteer", "source_ids": [ "BX-GEO-GN" ], "record": { "id": "BX-GEO-GN", "title": "GeoNames CN gazetteer", "url": "https://download.geonames.org/export/dump/", "description": "今聚落控制点用于研究图配准与背景参照。未因现代同名位置认定古关址；排除王屋同名聚落作为控制点。", "credit": "GeoNames, CC BY 4.0; accessed 2026-10-25.", "license_url": "https://www.geonames.org/about.html", "author": "数据责任者见署名", "locator": "地形／水系／现代聚落和研究图制图依据", "read_state": "制图说明与实际区域数据已读取；详见research/geo", "limits": "今聚落控制点用于研究图配准与背景参照。未因现代同名位置认定古关址；排除王屋同名聚落作为控制点。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-eec115ecbc77", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-GEO-HYDRO", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "HydroRIVERS v1.0 · Asia", "source_ids": [ "BX-GEO-HYDRO" ], "record": { "id": "BX-GEO-HYDRO", "title": "HydroRIVERS v1.0 · Asia", "url": "https://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrorivers", "description": "现代河网参照，源于15角秒HydroSHEDS，保留上游汇水面积80km²以上河段，并在通道周边补至10km²；不当作古代各时期河道或路面测绘。", "credit": "Lehner, B. and Grill, G. (2013), Hydrological Processes 27(15):2171–2186, doi:10.1002/hyp.9740.", "license_url": "https://data.hydrosheds.org/file/technical-documentation/HydroRIVERS_TechDoc_v10.pdf", "author": "数据责任者见署名", "locator": "地形／水系／现代聚落和研究图制图依据", "read_state": "制图说明与实际区域数据已读取；详见research/geo", "limits": "现代河网参照，源于15角秒HydroSHEDS，保留上游汇水面积80km²以上河段，并在通道周边补至10km²；不当作古代各时期河道或路面测绘。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-a112027c838c", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-GEO-DEM", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "Mapzen / Tilezen Terrain Tiles", "source_ids": [ "BX-GEO-DEM" ], "record": { "id": "BX-GEO-DEM", "title": "Mapzen / Tilezen Terrain Tiles", "url": "https://registry.opendata.aws/terrain-tiles/", "description": "地形取公开Terrarium z8高程瓦片，按高程与局部起伏铺山。符号不代表单峰位置、真实山高或历史地貌。USGS SRTM / GMTED2010；NOAA ETOPO1。", "credit": "Terrain data courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey (SRTM, GMTED2010) and NOAA (ETOPO1); Mapzen/Tilezen.", "license_url": "https://github.com/tilezen/joerd/blob/master/docs/attribution.md", "author": "数据责任者见署名", "locator": "地形／水系／现代聚落和研究图制图依据", "read_state": "制图说明与实际区域数据已读取；详见research/geo", "limits": "地形取公开Terrarium z8高程瓦片，按高程与局部起伏铺山。符号不代表单峰位置、真实山高或历史地貌。USGS SRTM / GMTED2010；NOAA ETOPO1。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-c8c0dd0ac660", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S16", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "“穿行千载、回溯古道”——我院师生重走蒲阴陉古道", "source_ids": [ "BX-S16" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S16", "title": "“穿行千载、回溯古道”——我院师生重走蒲阴陉古道", "author": "文：夏蕊、刘雯；河北大学历史学院", "url": "https://history.hbu.cn/info/1034/3028.htm", "locator": "2024-06-14，网页行54—65", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25T13:11:00+08:00", "read_state": "正文相关段落已读，图像／GPS原记录未取得", "limits": "课程实践报告列出三说并选择其中一条踏查；选择踏查不等于完成学术排他证明。保留其地理表述，未自行纠正或拼接。", "web_refs": [ "turn15view2" ] } }, { "id": "bx-s-a3e39d25e706", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S33", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "八达岭长城保护规划（颁布版）及公布通知", "source_ids": [ "BX-S33" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S33", "title": "八达岭长城保护规划（颁布版）及公布通知", "author": "北京市文物局；北京市延庆区八达岭长城管理处、北京北建大建筑设计研究院有限公司", "url": "https://wwj.beijing.gov.cn/bjww/362679/362680/482911/325986292/index.html", "locator": "京文物〔2022〕1262号；附件2022年9月版；PDF第1、5、11、48、52—54页", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25T14:06:19+08:00", "read_state": "PDF原件下载，88页；上述选页文字或像素核读，非全册通读", "limits": "PDF元数据误题侯马市晋国，封面及正文实为八达岭。图05、06含历史关系图，不能当汉唐实测古道。原图重用许可未定。", "web_refs": [ "turn50view0", "turn49search48" ], "attachment_url": "https://wwj.beijing.gov.cn/bjww/362679/362680/482911/325986292/2023060116522338710.pdf" } }, { "id": "bx-s-fe0529e95f78", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S65", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "关于北京市昌平区居庸关云台病害治理工程立项的请示", "source_ids": [ "BX-S65" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S65", "title": "关于北京市昌平区居庸关云台病害治理工程立项的请示", "author": "北京市文物局", "url": "https://wwj.beijing.gov.cn/bjww/362679/362680/482911/xxgkgzdt/1783768/index.html", "locator": "项目名称、地点、时代、保护等基本情况", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25", "read_state": "官方网页相关连续段落已读；本机下载403，未宣称本地原件", "limits": "材料的断代或现代说明与古代实测线位分开；不据材料补行军路线。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-d74c435840ce", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S75", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "响堂山石窟刻经项目：唐邕碑记", "source_ids": [ "BX-S75" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S75", "title": "响堂山石窟刻经项目：唐邕碑记", "author": "芝加哥大学东亚艺术研究中心", "url": "https://xts-inscriptions.uchicago.edu/", "locator": "项目首页·唐邕568—572年刻经说明", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25", "read_state": "项目首页全文及响堂山项目概览刻经段已读；未逐页核该碑拓片", "kind": "source_material", "catalog_title": "响堂山石窟刻经项目：唐邕碑记", "limits": "只采用所列已读文字命题；材料年代、古代行迹和本刊C层地图转绘分别判断，不补精确行军线。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-a338c0a8c997", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BD-S11", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "天长古镇", "source_ids": [ "BD-S11" ], "record": { "id": "BD-S11", "title": "天长古镇", "author": "井陉县人民政府", "url": "https://www.sjzjx.gov.cn/columns/067efea9-8a2f-41fd-8a46-863cb7b5bf4b/202002/13/28140229-a93b-424e-ba9f-d7fb30d6dbce.html", "locator": "县治年代说法", "kind": "source_material", "read_state": "仅读检索段；正文请求超时，暂作异说线索", "catalog_title": "天长古镇" } }, { "id": "bx-s-730727f8a67a", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S73", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "太行山白陉古道的千年绝唱", "source_ids": [ "BX-S73" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S73", "title": "太行山白陉古道的千年绝唱", "author": "贵州政协报网页所载纪行", "url": "https://www.gzszx.gov.cn/gzzxb/web/doc/detail/d_1416409852674144", "locator": "七十二拐山神祠碑及嘉庆十八年合社落款段", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25", "read_state": "检索返回的连续纪行段落已读；原站正文打开超时；未取得碑面、旧拓或完整碑文", "kind": "source_material", "catalog_title": "太行山白陉古道的千年绝唱", "limits": "只采用所列已读文字命题；材料年代、古代行迹和本刊C层地图转绘分别判断，不补精确行军线。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-441eb5178d30", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BD-S10", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "太行腹地 如碗一座城", "source_ids": [ "BD-S10" ], "record": { "id": "BD-S10", "title": "太行腹地 如碗一座城", "author": "晋城市人民政府转载山西晚报", "url": "https://www.jcgov.gov.cn/dtxx/tpxw/202010/t20201023_1249036.shtml", "locator": "2020-10-23·现场摄影报道", "kind": "source_material", "read_state": "已读全文；仅采用可见遗迹与记者考察线索，不采传说为史实", "catalog_title": "太行腹地 如碗一座城" } }, { "id": "bx-s-ee04ed4fbb52", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S27", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "山西省人民政府关于公布第六批省级文物保护单位的通知及附件", "source_ids": [ "BX-S27" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S27", "title": "山西省人民政府关于公布第六批省级文物保护单位的通知及附件", "author": "山西省人民政府", "url": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/山西省人民政府关于公布第六批省级文物保护单位的通知（晋政函〔2021〕102号）.pdf", "locator": "晋政函〔2021〕102号，2021-08-04；附件古遗址第18项，印刷页4／PDF第5页", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25T13:11:00+08:00", "read_state": "通知与附件相关表格文本已读；已请求对应页截图，未以像素复核作验收结论", "limits": "政府文件的存档副本；名录遗存年代不等于整条通道最早使用年代。只采用该行地点、类别、时代。", "web_refs": [ "turn39view0", "turn40view0" ], "original_access": "原政府站引用入口未返回正文", "copyright": "政府文件" } }, { "id": "bx-s-c8a637e11bd0", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S53", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "我省第四次全国文物普查成果丰硕：寻访燕赵遗珍，摸清文物家底", "source_ids": [ "BX-S53" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S53", "title": "我省第四次全国文物普查成果丰硕：寻访燕赵遗珍，摸清文物家底", "author": "河北日报／河北省文物局", "url": "https://wenwu.hebei.gov.cn/system/2026/08/03/030391322.shtml", "locator": "2026-08-03；RTK、专项调查、新章村段", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25T14:54:12+08:00", "read_state": "相关正文已读", "limits": "总结没有提供全套坐标附件；秦代车同轨属新闻表述，不能独立断代道路本体。", "web_refs": [ "turn79view2" ] } }, { "id": "bx-s-c4da35f54bdb", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S34", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "沁阳市常平乡国土空间总体规划（2021—2035年）公示稿", "source_ids": [ "BX-S34" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S34", "title": "沁阳市常平乡国土空间总体规划（2021—2035年）公示稿", "author": "沁阳市常平乡人民政府", "url": "https://oss.jiaozuo.gov.cn/4108820001/upload-file/files/20250926/57e049c8e66c4bf6b2a25d0d268d70e7.pdf", "locator": "2025年9月；PDF第11、33页／印页7、29，第15、66条", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25T14:06:19+08:00", "read_state": "相关条文文本已读，附图未审", "limits": "公示稿不是最终批准文本；列名不提供道路几何、遗存测年或保护线顶点。", "web_refs": [ "turn52view0", "turn56view3" ] } }, { "id": "bx-s-75ca1d9498db", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/reading.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BD-S09", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "河北省历史文化名镇", "source_ids": [ "BD-S09" ], "record": { "id": "BD-S09", "title": "河北省历史文化名镇", "author": "河北省文化和旅游厅", "url": "https://whly.hebei.gov.cn/c/2018-07-16/556535.html", "locator": "天长镇、暖泉镇段", "kind": "source_material", "read_state": "已读官网全文相关段；页面注明网络整理，历史判断按C级", "catalog_title": "河北省历史文化名镇" } }, { "id": "bx-s-02ec13b399a7", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S81", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "百年京张 世纪经典", "source_ids": [ "BX-S81" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S81", "title": "百年京张 世纪经典", "author": "国家铁路局；来源中国铁路总公司", "url": "https://source.nra.gov.cn/tlfc/tpsy/202204/t20220405_293018.shtml", "locator": "正文1905—1909年建设及京张路工撮影说明", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25", "read_state": "官方页面正文行80—90已读，确认建设区间及主持人；未下载和采用写真图版", "kind": "source_material", "catalog_title": "百年京张 世纪经典", "limits": "只采用所列已读文字命题；材料年代、古代行迹和本刊C层地图转绘分别判断，不补精确行军线。" } }, { "id": "bx-s-a9d9bb659adb", "topic": "baxing", "kind": "source_material", "source_path": "topics/baxing/content.json", "source_pointer": "/sources/BX-S67", "reason": "机构材料／数据库／规划／纪行等来源类型独立登记，不冒充古籍或确年事件。", "name": "背水之战", "source_ids": [ "BX-S67" ], "record": { "id": "BX-S67", "title": "背水之战", "author": "井陉县人民政府", "url": "https://www.sjzjx.gov.cn/columns/cf618d1e-cf4b-4552-a5cc-4635204fcaa2/index.html", "locator": "2023-05-23正文", "retrieved_at": "2026-10-25", "read_state": "官方网页全文已读；古战场精确位置与兵力不依此文补地图", "limits": "材料的断代或现代说明与古代实测线位分开；不据材料补行军路线。" } } ] }